[Theory]
 Instead of a 10-scale
#1
We should be rating looks based off of a bell-curve and z-scores.

This is because, well, that's more or less how nature actually seems to work, or at least more accurate to how it works. Take the species, curve it, yeah.

Sub8 needs a moniker way of being replaced by μ+2σ, or 13.6% of the population instead.

What are some monikers we could use for that?
Reply
#2
we don't rate looks here
Reply
#3
(10-02-2023, 04:48 AM)зайчик Wrote: we don't rate looks here

I meant for lookstheory/looks study/looksmaxxing/etc
Reply
#4
too low iq to do that Green
weird flex btw
What
Reply
#5
isnt this just PSL scale
"Show me your looks and I'll show you your future"
Reply
#6
(10-02-2023, 05:07 AM)10khitman Wrote: isnt this just PSL scale

slightly adjusted, but somewhat yeag
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: