[Theory]
Instead of a 10-scale - Printable Version+- Lookism (https://bookism.net)
+-- Forum: Lookism Forums (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Shitty Advice (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread:
[Theory]
Instead of a 10-scale (/showthread.php?tid=12971)Instead of a 10-scale - Repsel1001 - 10-02-2023
We should be rating looks based off of a bell-curve and z-scores.
This is because, well, that's more or less how nature actually seems to work, or at least more accurate to how it works. Take the species, curve it, yeah.
Sub8 needs a moniker way of being replaced by μ+2σ, or 13.6% of the population instead.
What are some monikers we could use for that?
RE: Instead of a 10-scale - hurt - 10-02-2023
we don't rate looks here
RE: Instead of a 10-scale - Repsel1001 - 10-02-2023
(10-02-2023, 04:48 AM)зайчик Wrote: we don't rate looks here
I meant for lookstheory/looks study/looksmaxxing/etc
RE: Instead of a 10-scale - eldajaal1488 - 10-02-2023
too low iq to do that
weird flex btw
RE: Instead of a 10-scale - 10khitman - 10-02-2023
isnt this just PSL scale
RE: Instead of a 10-scale - Repsel1001 - 10-02-2023
(10-02-2023, 05:07 AM)10khitman Wrote: isnt this just PSL scale
slightly adjusted, but somewhat yeag