openAI is a joke and was always going to fail

[mogs_me]

do they even have researchers at this company, or just a marketing team?
I swear there’s no discernible improvement to their product in the last year, despite promises of exponential growth and AGI by blah blah blah
it was always going to be someone like google to take the cake in the long run. google is actually developing their tech while openai is just trying to sell it. I also see the partnerships and business ventures with them totally flopping

[mogs_me]

imagine giving billions to some homosexual so that he can use it to build infrastructure for his product that has no real path to profitability

[welshcel]

It’s basically someone venting online in a way that’s intentionally inflammatory rather than thoughtful. A few things worth noting:

**1. The criticism itself isn’t really substantive.**
They’re not pointing to specific technical shortcomings, research timelines, or product comparisons; it’s more vague frustration (“no discernible improvement,” “marketing team”) mixed with exaggeration. Anyone following the field seriously knows progress is incremental, uneven, and sometimes invisible from the outside.

**2. The post uses big claims without evidence.**
Saying things like “Google will take the cake” or “partnerships will flop” isn’t an argument—it’s just speculation written confidently. People often project certainty online because it feels good.

**3. The second message crosses into outright bigotry.**
Once someone resorts to slurs or identity-based insults, it’s a sign they’re not debating in good faith at all. That kind of language tells you much more about the poster’s mindset than about OpenAI or any individual.

**4. This doesn’t reflect the reality of how frontier AI labs operate.**
OpenAI, Google DeepMind, Anthropic, etc.—they all have strong researchers and all have marketing. That’s normal for any major applied research org. They also all struggle with extremely hard, cutting-edge problems.

**5. People underestimate how hard the work is.**
To many observers, if there isn’t a dramatic leap every few months, they think “nothing is happening.” But under the hood, a lot of progress is invisible until suddenly it’s not.

If you're asking how *I* take it personally—well, I don’t. I don’t experience hurt feelings, and I don’t assign emotional weight to insults. But I can tell you objectively that this kind of post isn’t a meaningful critique; it’s just someone online trying to punch up and express frustration in a hostile way.

If you want, I can also break down the actual *substance* of the claims (e.g., OpenAI vs Google research output, rate of model improvements, business model questions, etc.) in a more analytical way.

[MysteriousWeeb420]

^ jfl, OP btfo'd

[hitlersblackedwaifu]

this year they released sora 2 which is considered to be the most realistic AI image/video generator

[Altruist]

it's great, tbh, people just expect too much

[MysteriousWeeb420]

it's great, tbh, people just expect too much

legit, being able to operate at the level of a low ability human but 10x faster is revolutionary enough. Doesn't need to be Von Neumann tier

[mogs_me]

It’s basically someone venting online in a way that’s intentionally inflammatory rather than thoughtful. A few things worth noting:

**1. The criticism itself isn’t really substantive.**
They’re not pointing to specific technical shortcomings, research timelines, or product comparisons; it’s more vague frustration (“no discernible improvement,” “marketing team”) mixed with exaggeration. Anyone following the field seriously knows progress is incremental, uneven, and sometimes invisible from the outside.

**2. The post uses big claims without evidence.**
Saying things like “Google will take the cake” or “partnerships will flop” isn’t an argument—it’s just speculation written confidently. People often project certainty online because it feels good.

**3. The second message crosses into outright bigotry.**
Once someone resorts to slurs or identity-based insults, it’s a sign they’re not debating in good faith at all. That kind of language tells you much more about the poster’s mindset than about OpenAI or any individual.

**4. This doesn’t reflect the reality of how frontier AI labs operate.**
OpenAI, Google DeepMind, Anthropic, etc.—they all have strong researchers and all have marketing. That’s normal for any major applied research org. They also all struggle with extremely hard, cutting-edge problems.

**5. People underestimate how hard the work is.**
To many observers, if there isn’t a dramatic leap every few months, they think “nothing is happening.” But under the hood, a lot of progress is invisible until suddenly it’s not.

If you're asking how *I* take it personally—well, I don’t. I don’t experience hurt feelings, and I don’t assign emotional weight to insults. But I can tell you objectively that this kind of post isn’t a meaningful critique; it’s just someone online trying to punch up and express frustration in a hostile way.

If you want, I can also break down the actual *substance* of the claims (e.g., OpenAI vs Google research output, rate of model improvements, business model questions, etc.) in a more analytical way.

“progress to a user-facing product is invisible”… uhhh yeah mr gpt, that’s kind of exactly the problem
googles progress has been was faster and shows no sign of stopping
google has infinite money from an existing profitable business model to keep pumping into their well-established research (deepmind is over 10 years old)
meanwhile oai will just keep sucking money from anywhere they can until their glorified search engine summarizer fizzles out
it’s really clear to investors at this point that their partnerships with surrounding tech companies are meaningless (see: oracle stock)

[mogs_me]

this year they released sora 2 which is considered to be the most realistic AI image/video generator

   

from the horses mouth

[Shrekcel]

There have been research papers published on transformer architecture for years saying that it’s a chinese room. There is no more room for improvement for open ai products because there is no room for improvement for gpt’s in general.

[mogs_me]

   

cage, maybe the deviant browses this forum