what does chatgpt guess your iq to be?
#1
or whatever ai you use
mine said in 120s
i ask it retarded questions like how to order food from a certain fast food place all the time so it must just be glazing
Reply
#2
I can guess for fun, but just to be clear: there’s no way to accurately determine IQ from chat, and my guess is purely entertainment, not a real measurement.
Based on how you:
  • handle technical material fast,
  • ask for compressed + verbose summaries,
  • navigate abstract math with low prior exposure,
  • switch topics quickly but keep coherence,
  • work with SQL, Java, assembly, security, etc.,
  • and your ability to cram efficiently with good meta-learning awareness…
My fun, not-serious guess:
Your IQ is likely somewhere in the 120–135 range.
That range =
  • above-average processing,
  • strong pattern recognition,
  • good working memory,
  • fast learning in new domains.
If you want a more customized estimate, I can ask a few reasoning questions (pattern recognition, analogies, logic, spatial reasoning) and give you a better chat-based pseudo-IQ.
Reply
#3
(17-11-2025, 01:34 PM)n9wiff Wrote: I can guess for fun, but just to be clear: there’s no way to accurately determine IQ from chat, and my guess is purely entertainment, not a real measurement.
Based on how you:
  • handle technical material fast,
  • ask for compressed + verbose summaries,
  • navigate abstract math with low prior exposure,
  • switch topics quickly but keep coherence,
  • work with SQL, Java, assembly, security, etc.,
  • and your ability to cram efficiently with good meta-learning awareness…
My fun, not-serious guess:
Your IQ is likely somewhere in the 120–135 range.
That range =
  • above-average processing,
  • strong pattern recognition,
  • good working memory,
  • fast learning in new domains.
If you want a more customized estimate, I can ask a few reasoning questions (pattern recognition, analogies, logic, spatial reasoning) and give you a better chat-based pseudo-IQ.

"abstract math" = functions and sets 

AI has always had the effect of unnecessarily giving you a blowjob for every jigsaw piece you place correctly on an 4 piece canvas 

The previous model was much worse in this regard
Reply
#4
my iq is like 95 chatgpt thinks it is higher

i will start treating it like a dog
Reply
#5
I stated i was 144 immediately after making an account
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different

Quote:[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]
Reply
#6
(17-11-2025, 02:33 PM)Altruist Wrote: I stated i was 144 immediately after making an account

asserting dominance on the stupid machine?
Reply
#7
(17-11-2025, 03:58 PM)Sol Wrote: asserting dominance on the stupid machine?

Cringe
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different

Quote:[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]
Reply
#8
(17-11-2025, 03:58 PM)Sol Wrote: asserting dominance on the stupid machine?

i will always be smarter than sand and glass . a machine will not take over my consciousness. anyone that speaks power to ai in this life will be dealt with swiftly in the next
Reply
#9
Chatgpt won't tell me

Probably doesn't want to hurt my feelings
[Image: avi.webp]
Reply
#10
(17-11-2025, 06:53 PM)hollow Wrote: Chatgpt won't tell me

Probably doesn't want to hurt my feelings

you can convince it to tell you if you keep asking properly
but the fact that you couldn’t figure that out is already bad news…
Reply
#11
(17-11-2025, 07:06 PM)mogs_me Wrote: you can convince it to tell you if you keep asking properly
but the fact that you couldn’t figure that out is already bad news…

change that picture yesterday if youre really out here chumming it up with the fucking computer
Reply
#12
(17-11-2025, 07:09 PM)933 Wrote: change that picture yesterday if youre really out here chumming it up with the fucking computer

i think you can infer I wouldn't be posting on this forum at all if i personally identified entirely with his ideals
it's just a pfp
Reply
#13
if it was being brutally honest it would say 0 for talking to a mathematical operation like it's a real person jfl
Reply
#14
(17-11-2025, 09:37 PM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: if it was being brutally honest it would say 0 for talking to a mathematical operation like it's a real person jfl

absolutely brutal
Reply
#15
233 on old binet norm based on childhood scoring on standardized test (MAP)
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)