[BBC] Who counts as "black" in america

[Fabulous Fabricator]

I was reading an article about african/"black" inventors and this person came up.



Looks dominantly caucasoid.

If it's self-identity, why won't more non-negroid americans start identifying as "black" nowadays to get
BLM privileges?

[kathisterima]

it's because he tries to pass as white

slicks hair back
wears suit + tie
doesn't throw up gang signs at the camera

[Fabulous Fabricator]

it's because he tries to pass as white

slicks hair back
wears suit + tie
doesn't throw up gang signs at the camera

No one passes anywhere in africa:

[Altruist]

blacks are more intelligent than both whites and east asians; it hasn't shown yet simply because circumstances of the universe threw a much harder path at them (warm climate = proliferation of life = much harder to gain control over the environment)

current situation is not representative due to the explosion of technology in the uk from f. bacon & newton onwards; in 100/150 years, "black" will be synonymous with "cognitively superior"

[Fabulous Fabricator]

blacks are more intelligent than both whites and east asians; it hasn't shown yet simply because circumstances of the universe threw a much harder path at them (warm climate = proliferation of life = much harder to gain control over the environment)

current situation is not representative due to the explosion of technology in the uk from f. bacon & newton onwards; in 100/150 years, "black" will be synonymous with "cognitively superior"

Is this (((black))) enough to qualify as cognitively superior?



https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9272519/Aboriginal-woman-slams-trolls-ask-percentage-indigenous-is.html

To me it looks like she failed to prove any superiority besides her confirmed cognitively superior idiocy.

[noi_avorrit]

blacks are more intelligent than both whites and east asians; it hasn't shown yet simply because circumstances of the universe threw a much harder path at them (warm climate = proliferation of life = much harder to gain control over the environment)

current situation is not representative due to the explosion of technology in the uk from f. bacon & newton onwards; in 100/150 years, "black" will be synonymous with "cognitively superior"

Is this (((black))) enough to qualify as cognitively superior?



https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9272519/Aboriginal-woman-slams-trolls-ask-percentage-indigenous-is.html

To me it looks like she failed to prove any superiority besides her confirmed cognitively superior idiocy.

She said she's aboriginal, although she doesn't look so at all, at least to the naked eye. Maybe she's only a small bit aboriginal, although still takes advantage of it to claim herself as so and be a drama queen.

[Fabulous Fabricator]

She said she's aboriginal,

*Australian aboriginal

Afrocentrists say they are black as well, basing their retarded opinion on some convergent similarities in looks. Which is what i use to debunk their shitty blackness agenda, if negroship proof requires alluding to looks, then stop counting mostly caucasoid-looking folks (such as one in the OP) as blacks.

[noi_avorrit]

*Australian aboriginal

Afrocentrists say they are black as well, basing their retarded opinion on some convergent similarities in looks. Which is what i use to debunk their shitty blackness agenda, if negroship proof requires alluding to looks, then stop counting mostly caucasoid-looking folks (such as one in the OP) as blacks.

Sorry, I forgot the "australian" part of aboriginal. 

I don't know much about afrocentrists as I ween they just say nonsense, however I think they're the ones claiming ancient Egypt was wholly black or something and that the pyramids were built by them as well right? 

Your method to debunk them seems to be quite effective as if they like to claim figures with only partial Negro it seems they're fake all along as they struggle to point to figures with whole Negro ancestry. 

Still I think afrocentrism isn't very widespread and only in some extreme woke black circles.

[Fabulous Fabricator]

however I think they're the ones claiming ancient Egypt was wholly black or something and that the pyramids were built by them as well right?

Egypt was founded by west-asian looking semitic caucasoids. Then it got conquered by nubians who were intermediate between caucasoid and negroid by phenotype, not sure how they formed genetically though.

they like to claim figures with only partial Negro it seems they're fake all along as they struggle to point to figures with whole Negro ancestry.

If you refute looks australian natives and most north africans are not black, since they don't have recent south african ancestry. Whatever is used to prove "blackness" is moronic. American concept of race is even more so.

[Altruist]

niggers

[anonymousloser]

niggers

[noi_avorrit]

Egypt was founded by west-asian looking semitic caucasoids. Then it got conquered by nubians who were intermediate between caucasoid and negroid by phenotype, not sure how they formed genetically though.

Interesting though, I already heard of the nubians once although I was never sure if they were north african or semitic.

If you refute looks australian natives and most north africans are not black, since they don't have recent south african ancestry. Whatever is used to prove "blackness" is moronic. American concept of race is even more so.

Indeed they aren't black, as you said it's just a moronic interpretation by afrocentrists. What do you mean by american concept of race? Things such as the former one drop rule or including iberians within the "hispanic (with all latin americans)" label for byspel?