Genuinely interested how people who narrowly miss jail feel
#1
Obviously shawshank is unrealistic cos 20 years in the pen is going to irrevocably damage your brain, but wonder how people who say spent 2 weeks inside or say narrowly escaped a longer term sentence feel, do they value their freedom or start seeing things different or do they just become even more disillusioned and start to rot away (@Manletmachine care to enlighten us?) . Scum 1989 is stll the best representation of the inefficacy of any true chance at redemption.
Reply
#2
it's not that dramatic. and most retards there aren't really in a position where they are capable of "rationally" gauging pros and cons of future criminal behavior to begin with, lmao

it's always hilarious to have those convos when i visit some of my clients in jail and have to pretend like this is their big "i learned my lesson" moment when i just know i ll be seeing them on hearings 5 months later, for a completely different crime
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different

Quote:[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]
Reply
#3
(16-09-2025, 07:32 PM)Altruist Wrote: it's not that dramatic. and most retards there aren't really in a position where they are "rationally" gauging pros and cons of future criminal behavior to begin with, lmao

Its true most dont really see that far ahead, but still there ought to be people who have had this experience. Im not looking for a sappy reddit tier anecdote but also there ought to be some difference in how they look at things , maybe they just got more hush hush with their dealings or whatnot.  Prison is scary especailly if you arent in Scandinavia or a minor in Japan. For somebody like @Manletmachine who is 21, facing the prospect of years in prison but having the entire trial deemed invalid because the prosecution is dumb as bricks has to elicit something.
Reply
#4
(16-09-2025, 07:32 PM)Altruist Wrote: it's not that dramatic. and most retards there aren't really in a position where they are capable of "rationally" gauging pros and cons of future criminal behavior to begin with, lmao

it's always hilarious to have those convos when i visit some of my clients in jail and have to pretend like this is their big "i learned my lesson" moment when i just know i ll be seeing them on hearings 5 months later, for a completely different crime

brutal
Reply
#5
(16-09-2025, 07:37 PM)Sexual chocolate Wrote: Its true most dont really see that far ahead, but still there ought to be people who have had this experience. Im not looking for a sappy reddit tier anecdote but also there ought to be some difference in how they look at things , maybe they just got more hush hush with their dealings or whatnot.  Prison is scary especailly if you arent in Scandinavia or a minor in Japan. For somebody like @Manletmachine who is 21, facing the prospect of years in prison but having the entire trial deemed invalid because the prosecution is dumb as bricks has to elicit something.

Quote:how people who say spent 2 weeks inside or say narrowly escaped a longer term sentence feel

these cases barely happen irl. like 1 in 3000. ignore the media reporting about criminal cases or litigations, they absolutely always omit or misinterpret crucial details (whether for sensationalism or, more often, not knowing the law). criminal law is extremely graded when it comes to penalizing, so you won't see guys like manletmachine being between walking free or getting "years in prison". at worst, he's likely gonna look at a suspended sentence, even if he has a criminal record already

those cases of people walking away because of muh procedural mistakes are also just hollywood nonsense. criminal codes always contain provisions that allow state attorneys to fix such mistakes; most of the time, the court is even obligated to warn them of those and instruct them to fix them (i. e., returning the incomplete or unclear indictment to them so that they could add the missing formal requirements or clarify the statement of facts which should give rise to reasonable doubt). also,99% of the time, you ll have a case going through the hands of multiple state attorneys, so there's no real chance they'll make some horrible mistake that would prevent even the judge from warning them about. and then there's legal remedies too
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different

Quote:[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]
Reply
#6
(16-09-2025, 07:52 PM)Altruist Wrote: these cases barely happen irl. criminal law is extremely graded when it comes to penalizing, so you won't see guys like manletmachine being between walking free or getting "years in prison". at worst, he's gonna look at a suspended sentence. 

those cases of people walking away because of procedural mistakes are also just hollywood nonsense. criminal codes always contain provisions that allow state attorneys to fix such mistakes; most of the time, the court is even obligated to warn them of those and instruct them to fix them (i. e., returning the incomplete or unclear indictment to them so that they could add the missing formal requirements or clarify the statement of facts which should give rise to reasonable doubt). also,99% of the time, you ll have a case going through the hands of multiple state attorneys, so there's no real chance they'll make some horrible mistake that would prevent even the judge from warning them about

what jurisdiction are you talking about? Manlet I believe got away with it not due to any procedural lapse but the accusation against him was heavily weakened by a video that was uploaded publicly. Although Id venture to guess its also very hard to argue against unlwaful entry/wielding of authority, would be interesting to see how the state would say fill in the gaps of cops being too greedy and muscling somebody inside their premises without a warrant esp. if they arent gazzetted. Reasonable doubt I guess could be eliminated or kept to a minimum but I read a case recently where somebody collecting a shipment of narcotics got away with it since they hadn't opened it yet, dude got out by arguing he was not conscious of posession.
Reply
#7
(16-09-2025, 07:52 PM)Altruist Wrote: these cases barely happen irl. like 1 in 3000. ignore the media reporting about criminal cases or litigations, they absolutely always omit or misinterpret crucial details (whether for sensationalism or, more often, not knowing the law). criminal law is extremely graded when it comes to penalizing, so you won't see guys like manletmachine being between walking free or getting "years in prison". at worst, he's likely gonna look at a suspended sentence, even if he has a criminal record already
could be
Reply
#8
(16-09-2025, 08:00 PM)Sexual chocolate Wrote: what jurisdiction are you talking about? Manlet I believe got away with it not due to any procedural lapse but the accusation against him was heavily weakened by a video that was uploaded publicly. Although Id venture to guess its also very hard to argue against unlwaful entry/wielding of authority, would be interesting to see how the state would say fill in the gaps of cops being too greedy and muscling somebody inside their premises without a warrant esp. if they arent gazzetted. Reasonable doubt I guess could be eliminated or kept to a minimum

i dont understand the question. what i said applies universally, in both civil and common law systems

regarding manlet, i dont know the details or anything about the situation, really. i m talking about procedural lapses because you brought them up and the entire trope annoys me

Quote:but I read a case recently where somebody collecting a shipment of narcotics got away with it since they hadn't opened it yet, dude got out by arguing he was not conscious of posession.

you didnt read that case, you read some retard journalist's summary of it as his sources told him. i mean yeah, in dubio pro reo is a thing, not sure what the point is
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different

Quote:[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]
Reply
#9
my country has enacted deinstitutionalization a decade or so ago. nowadays there are hostile, littered and isolated areas that were once common public spaces filled with zombies that roam free. once they run out of things to exchange for their drugs, they start doing 'minor crime' such as unarmed theft or 'pickpocketing.' they of course rarely go to jail and if they do, they spend very little time there. those people clearly have no forethought or developed conscience of their doings so its brutal to have them not locked up indefinitely somewhere
Reply
#10
I thrive in jail !
Reply
#11
They actually sentenced me to pay $1000 once.

But given that I was unemployed at the time, their real message was: "We want you in jail neeguh."

Which is another reason my country is my enemy.
Reply
#12
(16-09-2025, 08:36 PM)Busty Doll Wrote: They actually sentenced me to pay $1000 once.

But given that I was unemployed at the time, their real message was: "We want you in jail neeguh."

Which is another reason my country is my enemy.

Tyson
Reply
#13
Someone explain what happened to manletmachine already Rage
[Image: ustalarmeclisi0002026-06-07-15-31-068945...bd7fba.jpg]
Reply
#14
(16-09-2025, 08:46 PM)Mr Looks Wrote: Someone explain what happened to manletmachine already Rage

he is brown
Reply
#15
(16-09-2025, 08:48 PM)ΛΟΓΟΣ Wrote: he is brown


Stick to jewspiracy posts
[Image: ustalarmeclisi0002026-06-07-15-31-068945...bd7fba.jpg]
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)