10-02-2024, 04:13 PM
And God said 'faggotry was good'.
![[Image: Cima_da_Conegliano%2C_God_the_Father.jpg]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7c/Cima_da_Conegliano%2C_God_the_Father.jpg)
![[Image: Cima_da_Conegliano%2C_God_the_Father.jpg]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7c/Cima_da_Conegliano%2C_God_the_Father.jpg)
|
God looked down up his creation and smiled
|
|
10-02-2024, 04:13 PM
And God said 'faggotry was good'.
![]()
10-02-2024, 04:40 PM
basically the strength of every theological argument ever constructed
religious people really have to deal with a lot of fucking cognitive dissonance and engage in Olympic medal tier mental gymnastics to keep their beliefs alive, lmfao if the concept of cognitive dissonance is even applicable to such a state of existence
10-02-2024, 05:28 PM
(10-02-2024, 04:40 PM)Michelangelo Wrote: basically the strength of every theological argument ever constructed *gigasigh* riddle me this, my pet: why does religion exist? why did it come about?
10-02-2024, 05:44 PM
(10-02-2024, 05:28 PM)slop Wrote:(10-02-2024, 04:40 PM)Michelangelo Wrote: basically the strength of every theological argument ever constructed riddle me this instead: why are you using the cheapest rhetorical "trick" there is, asking me an extremely complicated and vaguely (to the point it's borderline meaningless) put question, when it's obvious you've already decided whatever i say is gonna be "completely wrong" and stupid, and perfect for you to dunk on it with a thought you've already formulated? p.s. the question is rhetorical, the answer to this is always the same - because the person using the "trick" is not confident enough in just expressing their opinion, so they feel the need to weaken the position of the person they're talking to before actually giving a substantial input like a normal, intellectually honest person that genuinely believes they have an argument p.p.s. p.p.p.s
10-02-2024, 05:56 PM
wish the site didnt collapse as i was fixing the post above
10-02-2024, 06:03 PM
(10-02-2024, 05:44 PM)Michelangelo Wrote:oh no, don't mirror my syntax, now i'm no longer emotionally positioned to respond to your reply(10-02-2024, 05:28 PM)slop Wrote:(10-02-2024, 04:40 PM)Michelangelo Wrote: basically the strength of every theological argument ever constructed
10-02-2024, 06:25 PM
(10-02-2024, 05:28 PM)slop Wrote:(10-02-2024, 04:40 PM)Michelangelo Wrote: basically the strength of every theological argument ever constructed fear that mommy doesn't unconditionally love you ![]()
10-02-2024, 06:32 PM
(10-02-2024, 06:25 PM)bluerose Wrote:(10-02-2024, 05:28 PM)slop Wrote:(10-02-2024, 04:40 PM)Michelangelo Wrote: basically the strength of every theological argument ever constructed Imagine how much more peaceful the world would have been if Jesus was not the son of Mary, but of Mary Magdalene. this could have been me and my pet: instead we have this:
10-02-2024, 06:37 PM
God looked at your thread and said op is a faggot
10-02-2024, 06:37 PM
(10-02-2024, 06:32 PM)slop Wrote:(10-02-2024, 06:25 PM)bluerose Wrote:(10-02-2024, 05:28 PM)slop Wrote:(10-02-2024, 04:40 PM)Michelangelo Wrote: basically the strength of every theological argument ever constructed give mary magdalene her khaleesi arc @bibleauthors
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|