24-09-2025, 02:38 AM
Vegans atleast sometimes come in with certain facts and data ( questionable though they may be) , while every pacifist argument is literally some variant of war costing lives and inducing suffering, but their alternative to that is what exactly? Reenact the free love moment in the 60s, spike the water supply with anti- androgens? Heavily dissuade war aggressor policies/base expansion but don't take into account power dynamics are baked into contractual obligations themselves? I
f Hamas had caused more damage in October(?) then Palestine would never get any sympathy apart from the Arab world. Present day public sentiment simply relies on big dog- small dog polsci , and it's considered good manners to side with the small dog. i think the word itself is beta af as war understood as an inexorable supra-systemic necessity in nation states ought to be obvious by now
Obviously I'm not talking about diplomacy but unpreventable war manifesting from border tensions , security threats , national idealist projects etc
Anyone who thought Gandhian policies actually did anything are retarded as well, and the best soldiers often return as great warmongers like Junger.
f Hamas had caused more damage in October(?) then Palestine would never get any sympathy apart from the Arab world. Present day public sentiment simply relies on big dog- small dog polsci , and it's considered good manners to side with the small dog. i think the word itself is beta af as war understood as an inexorable supra-systemic necessity in nation states ought to be obvious by now
Obviously I'm not talking about diplomacy but unpreventable war manifesting from border tensions , security threats , national idealist projects etc
Anyone who thought Gandhian policies actually did anything are retarded as well, and the best soldiers often return as great warmongers like Junger.
