09-06-2022, 02:14 AM
Think about it: HIGH-STATUS ASSHOLE like celeb or etc. may tick off the wrong person and get shamed, public humiliation, character assault, etc.
But if some LOW-STATUS ASSHOLE tries to be sexist to women or etc. they know they can't "bring him down" since he is a nobody, no name, etc. in the eyes of society.
SO WHAT? IS THIS MAYBE AGAINST THE IDEA OF STATUSMAXXING? MORE STATUS MEANS MORE POTENTIAL TO FALL? LIKE A LADDER ... HIGHER UP YOU GO THE BIGGER THE FALL WILL BE!
Imagine some famous Chadlite being sexually aggressive ... Now imagine a nobody Chadlite. Which'll suffer more if some MEAN WOMAN gets angry? Celeb Chadlite or nobody one?
I THINK MAYBE IT ISN'T SO BLACK AND WHITE ... A "nobody" Chad can't be "knocked down" the same way a "popular" Chad could be ... Bigger reputation to lose and all that ... Bigger downfall ... More eyes to see & judge, etc.
So maybe BEING A LOW-STATUS ASSHOLE is better than being HIGH-STATUS ASSHOLE, regardless of LOOKS?
But if some LOW-STATUS ASSHOLE tries to be sexist to women or etc. they know they can't "bring him down" since he is a nobody, no name, etc. in the eyes of society.
SO WHAT? IS THIS MAYBE AGAINST THE IDEA OF STATUSMAXXING? MORE STATUS MEANS MORE POTENTIAL TO FALL? LIKE A LADDER ... HIGHER UP YOU GO THE BIGGER THE FALL WILL BE!
Imagine some famous Chadlite being sexually aggressive ... Now imagine a nobody Chadlite. Which'll suffer more if some MEAN WOMAN gets angry? Celeb Chadlite or nobody one?
I THINK MAYBE IT ISN'T SO BLACK AND WHITE ... A "nobody" Chad can't be "knocked down" the same way a "popular" Chad could be ... Bigger reputation to lose and all that ... Bigger downfall ... More eyes to see & judge, etc.
So maybe BEING A LOW-STATUS ASSHOLE is better than being HIGH-STATUS ASSHOLE, regardless of LOOKS?
