[Aspie]
IS IT BETTER TO BE A LOW-STATUS ASSHOLE?! Better to be NON-FAMOUS for being SEXIST?! - Printable Version+- Lookism (https://bookism.net)
+-- Forum: Lookism Forums (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Shitty Advice (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread:
[Aspie]
IS IT BETTER TO BE A LOW-STATUS ASSHOLE?! Better to be NON-FAMOUS for being SEXIST?! (/showthread.php?tid=3937)IS IT BETTER TO BE A LOW-STATUS ASSHOLE?! Better to be NON-FAMOUS for being SEXIST?! - bookieboy - 09-06-2022
Think about it: HIGH-STATUS ASSHOLE like celeb or etc. may tick off the wrong person and get shamed, public humiliation, character assault, etc.
But if some LOW-STATUS ASSHOLE tries to be sexist to women or etc. they know they can't "bring him down" since he is a nobody, no name, etc. in the eyes of society.
SO WHAT? IS THIS MAYBE AGAINST THE IDEA OF STATUSMAXXING? MORE STATUS MEANS MORE POTENTIAL TO FALL? LIKE A LADDER ... HIGHER UP YOU GO THE BIGGER THE FALL WILL BE!
Imagine some famous Chadlite being sexually aggressive ... Now imagine a nobody Chadlite. Which'll suffer more if some MEAN WOMAN gets angry? Celeb Chadlite or nobody one?
I THINK MAYBE IT ISN'T SO BLACK AND WHITE ... A "nobody" Chad can't be "knocked down" the same way a "popular" Chad could be ... Bigger reputation to lose and all that ... Bigger downfall ... More eyes to see & judge, etc.
So maybe BEING A LOW-STATUS ASSHOLE is better than being HIGH-STATUS ASSHOLE, regardless of LOOKS?
RE: IS IT BETTER TO BE A LOW-STATUS ASSHOLE?! Better to be NON-FAMOUS for being SEXIST?! - Eesharebba - 09-06-2022
get fucked and cancelled ,bitch.
RE: IS IT BETTER TO BE A LOW-STATUS ASSHOLE?! Better to be NON-FAMOUS for being SEXIST?! - SubterraneanFiend - 09-06-2022
![[Image: PwjlzAj.png?1]](https://i.imgur.com/PwjlzAj.png?1)