Why is objectifying people considered a bad thing?
#1
What is wrong with objects? People are only offended by it because they think they are superior to objects which is quite frankly disgusting. Just because something lies below you on the sentience spectrum does not mean you are better than it
Reply
#2
would u stfu 24/7 for 1 million dollars
Reply
#3
ok lets pretend 50% of people are fine to be called objects and 50% of people are unhappy to be called objects and would prefer to be seen as above objects 

which group do you think will receive better treatment (assuming looks etc. are same)?
if you're fine being called an object then expect to be treated like one i.e like trash.

this isn't an objective world. its full of trickery and deceits so that people can gain the upper hand
Reply
#4
you need to objectify most females to get anywhere eith them
Reply
#5
to use a hyperbole so that your peanut brain can process it - for the same reason slavery is morally unacceptable

you are laughably bad at this
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different

Quote:[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]
Reply
#6
(14-04-2022, 12:42 AM)antagonist Wrote: to use a hyperbole so that your peanut brain can process it - for the same reason slavery is morally unacceptable

you are laughably bad at this

an object is not necessarily property
Reply
#7
(14-04-2022, 01:03 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:
(14-04-2022, 12:42 AM)antagonist Wrote: to use a hyperbole so that your peanut brain can process it - for the same reason slavery is morally unacceptable

you are laughably bad at this

an object is not necessarily property

an object is considered as having less moral value than human. to label a human with such a name implies that they are of lower moral value. like calling a human an animal. or calling a human a 'clump of atoms' and so on.  it is dehumanising to call someone by something that is of lower moral value. it ignores their humanity
Reply
#8
(14-04-2022, 01:56 AM)Alexander Wrote:
(14-04-2022, 01:03 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:
(14-04-2022, 12:42 AM)antagonist Wrote: to use a hyperbole so that your peanut brain can process it - for the same reason slavery is morally unacceptable

you are laughably bad at this

an object is not necessarily property

an object is considered as having less moral value than human. to label a human with such a name implies that they are of lower moral value. like calling a human an animal. or calling a human a 'clump of atoms' and so on.  it is dehumanising to call someone by something that is of lower moral value. it ignores their humanity

wtf is moral value you are just making terms up and being human supremacist
Reply
#9
so wud u suggest humanizing objects or objectifying humans. It probably don't make any difference if you look at things macroscopically.
Reply
#10
(14-04-2022, 02:03 AM)kathisterima Wrote: so wud u suggest humanizing objects or objectifying humans. It probably don't make any difference if you look at things macroscopically.

I don't suggest anything, just critiscise everything so I feel better about myself
Reply
#11
Would you like to be called a object?
yeah... i just want it to be over already   Ugh
Reply
#12
(14-04-2022, 02:05 AM)Blau Wrote: Would you like to be called a object?

sure why not, some objects are pretty cool
Reply
#13
(14-04-2022, 02:05 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:
(14-04-2022, 02:03 AM)kathisterima Wrote: so wud u suggest humanizing objects or objectifying humans. It probably don't make any difference if you look at things macroscopically.

I don't suggest anything, just critiscise everything so I feel better about myself

ENTP trait
Reply
#14
(14-04-2022, 02:08 AM)kathisterima Wrote:
(14-04-2022, 02:05 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:
(14-04-2022, 02:03 AM)kathisterima Wrote: so wud u suggest humanizing objects or objectifying humans. It probably don't make any difference if you look at things macroscopically.

I don't suggest anything, just critiscise everything so I feel better about myself

ENTP trait
entp is a cool type
Reply
#15
(14-04-2022, 01:59 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:
(14-04-2022, 01:56 AM)Alexander Wrote:
(14-04-2022, 01:03 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:
(14-04-2022, 12:42 AM)antagonist Wrote: to use a hyperbole so that your peanut brain can process it - for the same reason slavery is morally unacceptable

you are laughably bad at this

an object is not necessarily property

an object is considered as having less moral value than human. to label a human with such a name implies that they are of lower moral value. like calling a human an animal. or calling a human a 'clump of atoms' and so on.  it is dehumanising to call someone by something that is of lower moral value. it ignores their humanity

wtf is moral value you are just making terms up and being human supremacist

who gets treated better human supremacist or human hater? do you not get what I am saying?
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)