Posts: 26,445
Threads: 3,226
Joined: Apr 2022
Reputation:
14,935
relatively easy
@ MysteriousWeeb420
@"Mikis Theodorakis"
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different
Quote:![[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]](https://i.ibb.co/8nqCLH50/Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookism-Edit-Buddy-and-Ignore-Lists.png)
Posts: 4,970
Threads: 567
Joined: Apr 2022
Reputation:
3,020
(6+1)*1=7
(7+4)*2=22
(22+1)*3=69
(69+2)*4=284
(284+?)*5=?
there is kind of a pattern but it doesn't fit
Posts: 172
Threads: 45
Joined: Jun 2022
Reputation:
79
Posts: 26,445
Threads: 3,226
Joined: Apr 2022
Reputation:
14,935
(03-06-2022, 01:25 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: (6+1)*1=7
(7+4)*2=22
(22+1)*3=69
(69+2)*4=284
(284+?)*5=?
there is kind of a pattern but it doesn't fit
6 - base (hence ;)
first next prime number x 1 = 7 x 1 = 7
first next prime number x 2 = 11 x 2 = 22
23 x 3 = 69
71 x 4 = 284
...
293 x 5 = 1465
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different
Quote:![[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]](https://i.ibb.co/8nqCLH50/Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookism-Edit-Buddy-and-Ignore-Lists.png)
Posts: 4,970
Threads: 567
Joined: Apr 2022
Reputation:
3,020
(03-06-2022, 01:39 AM)anger_manager Wrote: (03-06-2022, 01:25 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: (6+1)*1=7
(7+4)*2=22
(22+1)*3=69
(69+2)*4=284
(284+?)*5=?
there is kind of a pattern but it doesn't fit
6 - base (hence ;)
first next prime number x 1 = 7 x 1 = 7
first next prime number x 2 = 11 x 2 = 22
23 x 3 = 69
71 x 4 = 284
...
293 x 5 = 1465 checks out
I had the right idea I was just trying to add to get to the primes instead of teleporting to them
Posts: 5,102
Threads: 721
Joined: Apr 2022
Reputation:
5,033
don't you forget all the maths you've learned immediately after highschool? or is this only a sub 100 IQ thing
Posts: 26,445
Threads: 3,226
Joined: Apr 2022
Reputation:
14,935
(03-06-2022, 01:47 AM)Mikis Theodorakis Wrote: don't you forget all the maths you've learned immediately after highschool? or is this only a sub 100 IQ thing
i do
but it comes back pretty easily
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different
Quote:![[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]](https://i.ibb.co/8nqCLH50/Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookism-Edit-Buddy-and-Ignore-Lists.png)
Posts: 103
Threads: 11
Joined: Jun 2022
Reputation:
40
(03-06-2022, 01:51 AM)anger_manager Wrote: (03-06-2022, 01:47 AM)Mikis Theodorakis Wrote: don't you forget all the maths you've learned immediately after highschool? or is this only a sub 100 IQ thing
i do
but it comes back pretty easily
nah, you have savant tier memory
i remember your human benchmark thread tbh
Posts: 26,445
Threads: 3,226
Joined: Apr 2022
Reputation:
14,935
(03-06-2022, 01:53 AM)villager Wrote: (03-06-2022, 01:51 AM)anger_manager Wrote: (03-06-2022, 01:47 AM)Mikis Theodorakis Wrote: don't you forget all the maths you've learned immediately after highschool? or is this only a sub 100 IQ thing
i do
but it comes back pretty easily
nah, you have savant tier memory
i remember your human benchmark thread tbh
there are tricks that make it easier (aassociations to my pet events, grouping, positioning digits in quadrants etc)
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different
Quote:![[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]](https://i.ibb.co/8nqCLH50/Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookism-Edit-Buddy-and-Ignore-Lists.png)
Posts: 172
Threads: 45
Joined: Jun 2022
Reputation:
79
(03-06-2022, 01:47 AM)Mikis Theodorakis Wrote: don't you forget all the maths you've learned immediately after highschool? or is this only a sub 100 IQ thing
Couldn’t tell you how to solve a 9th grade quadratic to save my life
Posts: 26,445
Threads: 3,226
Joined: Apr 2022
Reputation:
14,935
(03-06-2022, 01:25 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: (6+1)*1=7
(7+4)*2=22
(22+1)*3=69
(69+2)*4=284
(284+?)*5=?
there is kind of a pattern but it doesn't fit
bump this on looksmax now. with ; after 6, to avoid retards trying to cop out of not having a clue
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different
Quote:![[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]](https://i.ibb.co/8nqCLH50/Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookism-Edit-Buddy-and-Ignore-Lists.png)
|