the problem of induction breaks math
#16
(11-02-2023, 05:24 PM)Born2Mog Wrote: impossible to accurately extrapolate scientific principles that function today to 1+ billion years ago

that doesn't mean it's impossible, it means that humanity sucks
[Image: wired-Log-In-New-512px-06.gif]
Reply
#17
(11-02-2023, 06:57 PM)AntonioJuraz Wrote:
(11-02-2023, 04:42 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:
(11-02-2023, 04:40 AM)10khitman Wrote: so when is 1+1 not 2

when I put two solid objects next to each other and a third one appears

two people having sex and making baby breaks math!

Not at all.
"Show me your looks and I'll show you your future"
Reply
#18
What a bunch of gaylords ITT
Reply
#19
(11-02-2023, 11:04 AM)Altruist Wrote: Also, orientative approximations need to have defining traits for both the object represented and the representant in order to be identifiable and discernible from other objects, events or phenomena generally.

[Image: giphy.gif?cid=6c09b952t996lars2cbsfneu1w...y.gif&ct=g]
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different

Quote:[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]
Reply
#20
If Russia Today can convince Jeffrey Sachs that up is down, we indeed have a problem with this post-truth society
Reply
#21
it's called mathematical fictionalism, and is patently obvious to anyone who's thought about the topic for longer than 5 seconds (provided that they have a functioning brain)
Reply
#22
op is a fag
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: