Posts: 7,130
Threads: 472
Joined: Mar 2022
Reputation:
5,730
I'm not talking about regular people of course, whose ignorance is excused, but the so-called looks experts of shitskinmax and truerateme, who really fail to grasp what aesthetics truly is about. I'm not trying to gatekeep looks but I really want to make those insufferable Indians giving these ratings shut up cuz they don't know shit.
Posts: 2,151
Threads: 208
Joined: Apr 2022
Reputation:
1,258
Posts: 7,130
Threads: 472
Joined: Mar 2022
Reputation:
5,730
(08-17-2022, 09:57 PM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: looks are subjective
Posts: 2,151
Threads: 208
Joined: Apr 2022
Reputation:
1,258
(08-17-2022, 09:58 PM)kathisterima Wrote: (08-17-2022, 09:57 PM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: looks are subjective
![[Image: thumb_reddit-soy-58376771.png]](https://pics.me.me/thumb_reddit-soy-58376771.png) hahaha reddit bad SOY!
Posts: 1,495
Threads: 242
Joined: Apr 2022
Reputation:
1,832
What are aesthetics truly about?
Posts: 7,130
Threads: 472
Joined: Mar 2022
Reputation:
5,730
(08-17-2022, 10:01 PM)Honest Wrote: What are aesthetics truly about?
it's art and words are too flaccid to define it
Posts: 2,151
Threads: 208
Joined: Apr 2022
Reputation:
1,258
(08-17-2022, 10:04 PM)kathisterima Wrote: (08-17-2022, 10:01 PM)Honest Wrote: What are aesthetics truly about?
it's art and words are too flaccid to define it
and interpretation of art is individual. jfl at making fun of redditors for being correct
Posts: 147
Threads: 10
Joined: Aug 2022
looks can be quantified mostly objectively
Posts: 7,130
Threads: 472
Joined: Mar 2022
Reputation:
5,730
(08-17-2022, 10:09 PM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: (08-17-2022, 10:04 PM)kathisterima Wrote: (08-17-2022, 10:01 PM)Honest Wrote: What are aesthetics truly about?
it's art and words are too flaccid to define it
and interpretation of art is individual. jfl at making fun of redditors for being correct
to an extent yes but your statement is inherently wrong, there's no point arguing over this since science has laid down the facts and I'm pretty sure you know that already
Posts: 2,151
Threads: 208
Joined: Apr 2022
Reputation:
1,258
(08-17-2022, 10:15 PM)kathisterima Wrote: (08-17-2022, 10:09 PM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: (08-17-2022, 10:04 PM)kathisterima Wrote: (08-17-2022, 10:01 PM)Honest Wrote: What are aesthetics truly about?
it's art and words are too flaccid to define it
and interpretation of art is individual. jfl at making fun of redditors for being correct
to an extent yes but your statement is inherently wrong, there's no point arguing over this since science has laid down the facts and I'm pretty sure you know that already
science is an art - it's all relative
Posts: 7,130
Threads: 472
Joined: Mar 2022
Reputation:
5,730
(08-17-2022, 10:17 PM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: (08-17-2022, 10:15 PM)kathisterima Wrote: (08-17-2022, 10:09 PM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: (08-17-2022, 10:04 PM)kathisterima Wrote: it's art and words are too flaccid to define it
and interpretation of art is individual. jfl at making fun of redditors for being correct
to an extent yes but your statement is inherently wrong, there's no point arguing over this since science has laid down the facts and I'm pretty sure you know that already
science is an art - it's all relative
I perceive this comment as agreeing with me, so thank you for affirming my perception
Posts: 680
Threads: 185
Joined: May 2022
Reputation:
522
opry is the only good looking male
Posts: 2,151
Threads: 208
Joined: Apr 2022
Reputation:
1,258
(08-17-2022, 10:20 PM)kathisterima Wrote: (08-17-2022, 10:17 PM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: (08-17-2022, 10:15 PM)kathisterima Wrote: (08-17-2022, 10:09 PM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: and interpretation of art is individual. jfl at making fun of redditors for being correct
to an extent yes but your statement is inherently wrong, there's no point arguing over this since science has laid down the facts and I'm pretty sure you know that already
science is an art - it's all relative
I perceive this comment as agreeing with me, so thank you for affirming my perception think about it this way: if you had pictures of 100 faces and asked 10,000 people to rank them in order of attractiveness, do you think they would all coincide?
of course they wouldn't because people value traits differently, whether by social and cultural exposure or by variation in underlying genetic brain structure
sure you could try and appeal to some "average" or "social consenus" but at that point you have already left the realm of objectivity
Posts: 1,495
Threads: 242
Joined: Apr 2022
Reputation:
1,832
(08-17-2022, 10:30 PM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: (08-17-2022, 10:20 PM)kathisterima Wrote: (08-17-2022, 10:17 PM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: (08-17-2022, 10:15 PM)kathisterima Wrote: to an extent yes but your statement is inherently wrong, there's no point arguing over this since science has laid down the facts and I'm pretty sure you know that already
science is an art - it's all relative
I perceive this comment as agreeing with me, so thank you for affirming my perception think about it this way: if you had pictures of 100 faces and asked 10,000 people to rank them in order of attractiveness, do you think they would all coincide?
of course they wouldn't because people value traits differently, whether by social and cultural exposure or by variation in underlying genetic brain structure
sure you could try and appeal to some "average" or "social consenus" but at that point you have already left the realm of objectivity
If you had a set of 100 numbers and asked 10,000 people to rank these numbers numerically, you would expect to see some variation. This doesn't mean that numerical rank is subjective.
Anyway, I think this topic is pretty pointless to pursue, seeing as we all lack the ability to fully communicate our "subjective opinions" in an objective way - if we could, then we would find that subjective/objective classification to be a false dichotomy.
Posts: 7,130
Threads: 472
Joined: Mar 2022
Reputation:
5,730
(08-17-2022, 10:30 PM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: think about it this way: if you had pictures of 100 faces and asked 10,000 people to rank them in order of attractiveness, do you think they would all coincide?
an evident pattern would be formed like in all attractiveness studies
you could ask 100 people to point at you the center of a shape, and their centers might be off, but that doesn't mean the center is up for interpretation
(08-17-2022, 10:30 PM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: of course they wouldn't because people value traits differently, whether by social and cultural exposure or by variation in underlying genetic brain structure
sure you could try and appeal to some "average" or "social consenus" but at that point you have already left the realm of objectivity
that might be true up to a certain extent
attractiveness is not a personal affair it's so stupid that you attribute this to "social consensus" when it transcends our time on this planet as organized societies and even our species
|