Would Schopenhauer be impressed by your ramblings?

[Dreckssau]

[kathisterima]

I dont think so, but I wasn't impressed by his either

[Dreckssau]

I dont think so, but I wasn't impressed by his either

"Not impressed, you say? How quaint, this little dismissal, like a mouse squeaking at the mountain for not bowing to its taste. That my writings, revered and studied by minds far greater than yours, fail to move you speaks not to their deficiency but to the dullness of your faculties. It is as if a blind man, stumbling past a painting by Raphael, declares it unimpressive—an indictment, not of the art, but of the critic’s blindness.

Had you the wit or depth to grasp even a fraction of my philosophy, you might understand that your very capacity to ‘judge’ my work is shaped by the Will that enslaves you—a force so base and primal that it renders your opinions trivial, driven by impulse rather than reason. My writings do not pander to the shallow appetites of mediocre minds; they demand effort, introspection, and the ability to endure truths that most people, including you, clearly find too unsettling to confront.

Rest assured, my work will outlive you by centuries, while your unimpressed remark will vanish like smoke in the air, leaving not even a trace to mock your ignorance."*

[kathisterima]

I'd rather not be remembered at all that to be remembered as a spiteful misogynistic incel. Maybe you were ahead of your time, as losers of that magnitude weren't as common back then, but you'd live under the shadow of megastar autists like MVP nowadays, hoping he tags you in one of his "singularity is imminent" threads.

[MVP]

I'd rather not be remembered at all that to be remembered as a spiteful misogynistic incel. Maybe you were ahead of your time, as losers of that magnitude weren't as common back then, but you'd live under the shadow of megastar autists like MVP nowadays, hoping he tags you in one of his "singularity is imminent" threads.

[Sexual chocolate]

I'd rather not be remembered at all that to be remembered as a spiteful misogynistic incel. Maybe you were ahead of your time, as losers of that magnitude weren't as common back then, but you'd live under the shadow of megastar autists like MVP nowadays, hoping he tags you in one of his "singularity is imminent" threads.

[slop slinger]

No Schopenhauer says he hates when people cite people, and I cite people

[n9wiff]

Don't read philosophy but these people sound like gaylords

[hello]

No Schopenhauer says he hates when people cite people, and I cite people

what does that mean

[towncel]

No Schopenhauer says he hates when people cite people, and I cite people

Even Schopenhauer can spot a true retard.

[towncel]

I'd rather not be remembered at all that to be remembered as a spiteful misogynistic incel. Maybe you were ahead of your time, as losers of that magnitude weren't as common back then, but you'd live under the shadow of megastar autists like MVP nowadays, hoping he tags you in one of his "singularity is imminent" threads.

I've never seen someone describe their situation that perfectly while trying to insult someone else.

[towncel]

Not even remotely, especially considering my threads contain direct insults towards specifically him.

[kathisterima]

I've never seen someone describe their situation that perfectly while trying to insult someone else.

how's your deceased cuck father doing

[slop slinger]

what does that mean

He says you should be able to say everything you need without mentioning other people.

If you mention other people at all it is because you are unoriginal.

[Dreckssau]

He says you should be able to say everything you need without mentioning other people.

If you mention other people at all it is because you are unoriginal.

Schopenhauer constantly mentions others in his writings, mainly Kant.