wow, the maxilla on this guy
#1
[Image: Dicksee-The_End_of_the_Quest-1921.jpg]


Chris Carmack tier skulls were far more common 100 years ago.
Reply
#2
shit painting tbh
Reply
#3
(12-12-2024, 06:51 PM)Sexual chocolate Wrote: shit painting tbh

indian standards are very high these days
Reply
#4
(12-12-2024, 06:59 PM)kathisterima Wrote: indian standards are very high these days

Indians cant enjoy art? thats an objectively shit painting, shame you cant see it.
Reply
#5
(12-12-2024, 07:17 PM)Sexual chocolate Wrote: Indians cant enjoy art?

seems so
Reply
#6
(12-12-2024, 07:19 PM)kathisterima Wrote: seems so

Compare its puerile composition to beskinski, bosch, carvaggio, raphael..
Reply
#7
(12-12-2024, 07:21 PM)Sexual chocolate Wrote: Compare its puerile composition to beskinski, bosch, carvaggio, raphael..

idc

dont try to make someone else's discussion about how well versed and sophisticated you are, dont want to hear that
Reply
#8
(12-12-2024, 07:36 PM)kathisterima Wrote: idc

dont try to make someone else's discussion about how well versed and sophisticated you are, dont want to hear that

Idk anything about art those artists most high schoolers know about.
Reply
#9
His maxilla overall isn't that good

Good nasion, nose projection and mandible though
Reply
#10
(12-12-2024, 07:21 PM)Sexual chocolate Wrote: Compare its puerile composition to beskinski, bosch, carvaggio, raphael..

it's probably cut from a larger painting

also lol at bosch muh composition. it's just old timey where's waldo cartoons:

[Image: 1070407-the-garden-of-earthly-delights.j...fit=bounds]
Reply
#11
(12-12-2024, 11:44 PM)fdeshieldplus Wrote: it's just old timey where's waldo cartoons

Dennis
Reply
#12
(12-12-2024, 11:44 PM)fdeshieldplus Wrote: also lol at bosch muh composition. it's just old timey where's waldo cartoons:
bosch kinda sucks yeah. too much bs, may aswell cut it into small pieces instead
Reply
#13
(12-12-2024, 06:51 PM)Sexual chocolate Wrote: shit painting tbh
its not really shit, but i dont consider myself ceremoniously moved either
Niro
its like decent to hang in living room and never really look at it
(12-12-2024, 07:21 PM)Sexual chocolate Wrote: Compare its puerile composition to beskinski, bosch, carvaggio, raphael..
tbh raphael is not as cool as others. kinda same as what i said above. caravaggio def goes hardest tho
Itis
just because u demand extraordinary doesnt make ordinary worthless. its just eh i guess yeah
Reply
#14
(13-12-2024, 05:52 AM)eldajaal1488 Wrote: its not really shit, but i dont consider myself ceremoniously moved either
Niro
its like decent to hang in living room and never really look at it
This. Also seems like a poster card rather than a painting, too much focus on subjects, sentimentality.
Reply
#15
(13-12-2024, 05:52 AM)eldajaal1488 Wrote: its not really shit, but i dont consider myself ceremoniously moved either
Niro
its like decent to hang in living room and never really look at it
tbh raphael is not as cool as others. kinda same as what i said above. caravaggio def goes hardest tho
Itis
just because u demand extraordinary doesnt make ordinary worthless. its just eh i guess yeah

Raphael I feel is deeper than it looks( not an art student so have no idea but I'm guessing). Bosch yeah is a bit garish but it's still better than most stuff that came out of romanticism
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)