[Black Pill] nothing more disgusting than "PLANNING FOR BABIES"

[brocode]

beauty is not just another shallow thing
it is an indicator of health

Of course

but I'm not sure what that has in regards to a point about sex being beautiful

bro u get awe at knowing vitamin d keeps our teeth naturally white, its beautiful
this is the way we naturally make babies, its beautiful

the way we naturally build cities and construct socities is fundamentally through burning villages and genocide. end result of human coexistence may be beautiful but the process can be disconnected from the end result. everything "good" must comes sin and impurity, its the ironic dichotomy of consciousness

disagree, we get to prosper as humans. is it a sin if its for our own good?

[brocode]

wrong, a healthy functioning human body and mind is reflected in one's lookz

it really isn't tbh, it's not biological. many athletes are ugly asf

being on gear while having a bad fatty liver disease doesnt count as healthy

most atheletes do look good however

[10khitman]

wrong, a healthy functioning human body and mind is reflected in one's lookz

it really isn't tbh, it's not biological. many athletes are ugly asf

true but theres a very strong correlation with health and a good look

sure strong cheekbones and a perfect jaw isnt necessarily an indicator of perfect health, but good colouring, resting facial posture and muscular tension, clean eyes, etc... are

if someones ridden with acne and has bloodshot eyes and a shriveled mouth chances are they are unhealthy

altho, lots of highly GL people get arrogant and sacrifice their health with drugs and alcohol etc and stay GL for a small period while being unhealthy, but long term it will reflect in their lookz

and about ugly athletes, like i said, they may be ugly from raw bone structure but otherwise they arent repulsive looking (skin, hair and eyes all look good, and if not they're probably on drugs and gonna fall off soon)

[brocode]

wrong, a healthy functioning human body and mind is reflected in one's lookz

it really isn't tbh, it's not biological. many athletes are ugly asf

true but theres a very strong correlation with health and a good look

sure strong cheekbones and a perfect jaw isnt necessarily an indicator of perfect health, but good colouring, resting facial posture and muscular tension, clean eyes, etc... are

if someones ridden with acne and has bloodshot eyes and a shriveled mouth chances are they are unhealthy

altho, lots of highly GL people get arrogant and sacrifice their health with drugs and alcohol etc and stay GL for a small period while being unhealthy, but long term it will reflect in their lookz

and about ugly athletes, like i said, they may be ugly from raw bone structure but otherwise they arent repulsive looking (skin, hair and eyes all look good, and if not they're probably on drugs and gonna fall off soon)

excellently said

[10khitman]

Of course

but I'm not sure what that has in regards to a point about sex being beautiful

bro u get awe at knowing vitamin d keeps our teeth naturally white, its beautiful
this is the way we naturally make babies, its beautiful

the way we naturally build cities and construct socities is fundamentally through burning villages and genocide. end result of human coexistence may be beautiful but the process can be disconnected from the end result. everything "good" must comes sin and impurity, its the ironic dichotomy of consciousness

disagree, we get to prosper as humans. is it a sin if its for our own good?

u did not just vindicate burning villages as morally positive bcuz its for the "greater good"

ur moral ideation is too numerical, computer-like

[brocode]

bro u get awe at knowing vitamin d keeps our teeth naturally white, its beautiful
this is the way we naturally make babies, its beautiful

the way we naturally build cities and construct socities is fundamentally through burning villages and genocide. end result of human coexistence may be beautiful but the process can be disconnected from the end result. everything "good" must comes sin and impurity, its the ironic dichotomy of consciousness

disagree, we get to prosper as humans. is it a sin if its for our own good?

u did not just vindicate burning villages as morally positive bcuz its for the "greater good"

ur moral ideation is too numerical, computer-like

i didnt say that
i didnt call for "burning humans". my thought was "developing villages into cities", thats what i inferred u figuratively meant.
but if u literally meant burning villages, of course i condem it and it is not right

[Lucy]

sure strong cheekbones and a perfect jaw isnt necessarily an indicator of perfect health, but good colouring, resting facial posture and muscular tension, clean eyes, etc... are

if someones ridden with acne and has bloodshot eyes and a shriveled mouth chances are they are unhealthy

altho, lots of highly GL people get arrogant and sacrifice their health with drugs and alcohol etc and stay GL for a small period while being unhealthy, but long term it will reflect in their lookz

none of those make someone inherently beautiful. for sure being unhealthy doesn't make someone attractive, rather the opposite, but so does nothing of this sort describe beauty as function of the biological or anything else for that matter

[10khitman]

the way we naturally build cities and construct socities is fundamentally through burning villages and genocide. end result of human coexistence may be beautiful but the process can be disconnected from the end result. everything "good" must comes sin and impurity, its the ironic dichotomy of consciousness

disagree, we get to prosper as humans. is it a sin if its for our own good?

u did not just vindicate burning villages as morally positive bcuz its for the "greater good"

ur moral ideation is too numerical, computer-like

i didnt say that
i didnt call for "burning humans". like developing villages into cities, thats what i inferred u figuratively meant.
but if u literally meant burning villages, of course i condem it and it is not right

no i meant societies are literally built from pillaging and mass murder

im not saying sex is equivalent to those things in terms of moral magnitude, but im making a comparison in logic, in that just because the end product of some action is "beautiful" it does not render the process by which it was reached beautiful or good.

I understand ur point but i think its just not linear like that. sex is not a selfless act, its utilitary and self serving, nobody thinks time to have sex bcuz we wanna make something beautiful, they think i want to achieve pleasure from using this human, its inherently greedy, selfish, prideful, (lustful)

[10khitman]

sure strong cheekbones and a perfect jaw isnt necessarily an indicator of perfect health, but good colouring, resting facial posture and muscular tension, clean eyes, etc... are

if someones ridden with acne and has bloodshot eyes and a shriveled mouth chances are they are unhealthy

altho, lots of highly GL people get arrogant and sacrifice their health with drugs and alcohol etc and stay GL for a small period while being unhealthy, but long term it will reflect in their lookz

none of those make someone inherently beautiful. for sure being unhealthy doesn't make someone attractive, rather the opposite, but so does nothing of this sort describe beauty as function of the biological or anything else for that matter

clean eyes, facial posture and colouring dont make someone beautiful? i dont totally follow what u mean here. if u mean the aesthetic of human face doesnt match the profundity of other things such as art or knowledge and hence isnt "beautiful" then i understand, but if you meant its not humanly attractive then i think ur mistaken

[brocode]

sure strong cheekbones and a perfect jaw isnt necessarily an indicator of perfect health, but good colouring, resting facial posture and muscular tension, clean eyes, etc... are

if someones ridden with acne and has bloodshot eyes and a shriveled mouth chances are they are unhealthy

altho, lots of highly GL people get arrogant and sacrifice their health with drugs and alcohol etc and stay GL for a small period while being unhealthy, but long term it will reflect in their lookz

none of those make someone inherently beautiful. for sure being unhealthy doesn't make someone attractive, rather the opposite, but so does nothing of this sort describe beauty as function of the biological or anything else for that matter

they do though, soft features are just as important to ur overall facial harmony as with bones and skin quality (how tight and naturally moisturized it is, undertones within a race variance etc).

[MysteriousWeeb420]

Nah should 100% be planned

dont be so robotic

believing that unprepared parents is not a drain on society and those involved is so naive it borderlines on robotic

[brocode]

Nah should 100% be planned

dont be so robotic

believing that unprepared parents is not a drain on society and those involved is so naive it borderlines on robotic

did u even read my post?
i emphasize on being financially and mentally resourceful before getting into a long term relationship.

u dont seem to understand the thread point, its about "'planning kids' after getting a life partner is bad" not "its bad to stay resourceful for ur offspring"

come on man dont be like those cuckmaxx posters

[MysteriousWeeb420]

Nah should 100% be planned

dont be so robotic

believing that unprepared parents is not a drain on society and those involved is so naive it borderlines on robotic

did u even read my post?
i emphasize on being financially and mentally resourceful before getting into a long term relationship.

u dont seem to understand the thread point, its about "'planning kids' after getting a life partner is bad" not "its bad to stay resourceful for ur offspring"

come on man dont be like those cuckmaxx posters

i read the title

in that case its literally the exact same thing. implicity planned vs explicitly planned. who cares either way

[brocode]

dont be so robotic

believing that unprepared parents is not a drain on society and those involved is so naive it borderlines on robotic

did u even read my post?
i emphasize on being financially and mentally resourceful before getting into a long term relationship.

u dont seem to understand the thread point, its about "'planning kids' after getting a life partner is bad" not "its bad to stay resourceful for ur offspring"

come on man dont be like those cuckmaxx posters

i read the title

in that case its literally the exact same thing. implicity planned vs explicitly planned. who cares either way

no it isnt the same thing
and no its not implicit planning vs explicit planning
its being prepared for the future vs being definite-lablike controlled future.