[LOL] cannot be stressed enough how cringe it is that autismo PSLers

[AlbanianLegend1994]

each have a certain something that they hold to be the threshold of 'chad' and evaluate you accordingly

you didn't make the cut because you don't have X (ideal ramus), Y (ideal gonial angle), Z (ideal lateral projection), etc

like i said before, guarantee you a bunch of people here who would meet me irl would think i'm high tier normie at best

but i literally had a girl tell me i was 15/10 the other day (and no not the bartender who thinks i'm going to date her)
and the compliments just can't stop flowing my way (yeah most are from 30+ year old women but the bartender is 24 btw)

i just walk now with the educated assumption that every girl finds me hot

might be humbling to show me a picture of jon erik hexum, but he doesn't exist anymore, and literally no one looks like that irl

[kathisterima]

yes thats what bothers the most in these communities

like they storm in some random thread to comment that the guy mentioned is not "chad" because their eye area is subpar compared to the male model they are in love with because xyz

way to look like a low caste hindu street-shitting slave

[lonelyjak]

this thread reminds me of that morph where somebody put shimanskis eye area on some guys face and it looked like complete crap (but that was the joke). it just goes to show that single featureceling is autismo, HARMONYmaxxing is where its at

[Steppenwolf]

i used to say that in early .org, too bad i wont share those legendary threads since my memes have become an userstyle there (copycat and cancer)

[Steppenwolf]

this thread reminds me of that morph where somebody put shimanskis eye area on some guys face and it looked like complete crap (but that was the joke). it just goes to show that single featureceling is autismo, HARMONYmaxxing is where its at

'harmony' isnt an explanation either

[lonelyjak]

this thread reminds me of that morph where somebody put shimanskis eye area on some guys face and it looked like complete crap (but that was the joke). it just goes to show that single featureceling is autismo, HARMONYmaxxing is where its at

'harmony' isnt an explanation either

yes it is. what really matters for decent looks is that all of your individual features work well with each other and are the correct proportion, compatible coloring etc. in the context of talking about focusing on single features my response about harmony makes perfect sense

what do you think im talking about? perhaps we have different ideas about what harmony means

[Steppenwolf]

this thread reminds me of that morph where somebody put shimanskis eye area on some guys face and it looked like complete crap (but that was the joke). it just goes to show that single featureceling is autismo, HARMONYmaxxing is where its at

'harmony' isnt an explanation either

what really matters for decent looks is that all of your individual features work well with each other and are the correct proportion, compatible coloring etc. in the context of talking about focusing on single features my response about harmony makes perfect sense

none of that exists

[lonelyjak]

this thread reminds me of that morph where somebody put shimanskis eye area on some guys face and it looked like complete crap (but that was the joke). it just goes to show that single featureceling is autismo, HARMONYmaxxing is where its at

'harmony' isnt an explanation either

what really matters for decent looks is that all of your individual features work well with each other and are the correct proportion, compatible coloring etc. in the context of talking about focusing on single features my response about harmony makes perfect sense

none of that exists

yeah it does. some people look decent with a relatively large philtrum and others do not; proportions of overall facial features relative to each other matter. likewise when it comes to coloring some people have desirable hair + eye color combos and others do not; this can even include the color of the eyebrows as well

the reason bad features look bad is because they're extreme which implies disproportionality. harmony implies good proportions. I dont know whats so hard to understand about that

[eldajaal1488]

if you mog anstrum u are chad. if he mogs you noticably u are normie. hes good measurement ironically. if hard to tell could be htn could be chadlite.
ted bundy is good one aswell

[Born2Mog]

if you mog anstrum u are chad. if he mogs you noticably u are normie. hes good measurement ironically. if hard to tell could be htn could be chadlite.
ted bundy is good one aswell

legit

[Born2Mog]

'harmony' isnt an explanation either

what really matters for decent looks is that all of your individual features work well with each other and are the correct proportion, compatible coloring etc. in the context of talking about focusing on single features my response about harmony makes perfect sense

none of that exists

yeah it does. some people look decent with a relatively large philtrum and others do not; proportions of overall facial features relative to each other matter. likewise when it comes to coloring some people have desirable hair + eye color combos and others do not; this can even include the color of the eyebrows as well

the reason bad features look bad is because they're extreme which implies disproportionality. harmony implies good proportions. I dont know whats so hard to understand about that

autism (both of you)

KYS

[eldajaal1488]

this thread reminds me of that morph where somebody put shimanskis eye area on some guys face and it looked like complete crap (but that was the joke). it just goes to show that single featureceling is autismo, HARMONYmaxxing is where its at

'harmony' isnt an explanation either

what really matters for decent looks is that all of your individual features work well with each other and are the correct proportion, compatible coloring etc. in the context of talking about focusing on single features my response about harmony makes perfect sense

none of that exists

facial averageness is kinda legit thing look it up. odd good looking people obviously are real, they just happen to have good features+low facial averageness. to x its weird looking, to someone its second coming of jesus

[lonelyjak]

what really matters for decent looks is that all of your individual features work well with each other and are the correct proportion, compatible coloring etc. in the context of talking about focusing on single features my response about harmony makes perfect sense

none of that exists

yeah it does. some people look decent with a relatively large philtrum and others do not; proportions of overall facial features relative to each other matter. likewise when it comes to coloring some people have desirable hair + eye color combos and others do not; this can even include the color of the eyebrows as well

the reason bad features look bad is because they're extreme which implies disproportionality. harmony implies good proportions. I dont know whats so hard to understand about that

autism (both of you)

KYS

your trashtalking schtick isnt really funny. I skip most of your posts because you add nothing to conversations, you just drop pointless one-liners. you should probably go back to looksmaxx bro

[Steppenwolf]

'harmony' isnt an explanation either

what really matters for decent looks is that all of your individual features work well with each other and are the correct proportion, compatible coloring etc. in the context of talking about focusing on single features my response about harmony makes perfect sense

none of that exists

facial averageness is kinda legit thing look it up. odd good looking people obviously are real, they just happen to have good features+low facial averageness. to x its weird looking, to someone its second coming of jesus

it does not and you would only think that because of specific nordic countries

[Steppenwolf]

'harmony' isnt an explanation either

what really matters for decent looks is that all of your individual features work well with each other and are the correct proportion, compatible coloring etc. in the context of talking about focusing on single features my response about harmony makes perfect sense

none of that exists

yeah it does. some people look decent with a relatively large philtrum and others do not; proportions of overall facial features relative to each other matter. likewise when it comes to coloring some people have desirable hair + eye color combos and others do not; this can even include the color of the eyebrows as well

the reason bad features look bad is because they're extreme which implies disproportionality. harmony implies good proportions. I dont know whats so hard to understand about that

you are acting no differento to what OP describe. some people look decent with a 'relatively' large philtrum maybe because their entire face isn't utterly horrendous