[Looksmax]
 Bad philosophers
#16
glissant
Reply
#17
(19-09-2024, 02:50 PM)Honest Wrote: is it ironic that you give a "why" to justify your explanation? 

anyway, this is reasonably common theme in philosophy. nietzsche mentions the evolutionary utility of language to attack our concepts of logic. wittgenstein also concerns himself with the utility of language and its inability to meaningfully address philosophical abstractions

Wittgenstein:

Nietzsche:

wittgenstein called his ramblings from the tractatus bullshit a couple of years later. still considered to be one of the greatest minds of the century. tells you everything you need to know about post-baconian philosophy
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different

Quote:[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]
Reply
#18
(20-09-2024, 01:07 AM)Altruist Wrote: wittgenstein called his ramblings from the tractatus bullshit a couple of years later. still considered to be one of the greatest minds of the century. tells you everything you need to know about post-baconian philosophy


theres still continuity between tlp and pi. as far as i can tell, he continued to believe that most 'philosophical problems' were due to a misuse/misunderstanding of language
and "a couple of years later"? more like a couple of decades later
Reply
#19
Brutal
Dark 
Reply
#20
(19-09-2024, 03:30 AM)slop slinger Wrote: what's your take on nietzsche's philosophy of the relation of affect and representation

what's your take on Nietzsche's contribution to the hermeneutics of suspicion

In what ways do you think the Deleuzian generation of philosophers in France  correctly and incorrectly intepreted Niezsche's theory of affect

In what ways if any do you think the relationship between lexis and logos in Nietzsche's early lectures on rhetoric inform his later theories of music in The Birth of Tragedy and beyond

To what extent do you think Nietzsche's understanding of voice in his lectures on rhetoric are original vs. an appropriation of Gustav Gerber's Die Sprache und das Erkennen


Actually forget all that. God isn't actually dead kek

Facepalm
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different

Quote:[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]
Reply
#21
[Image: 3ddc6752ef8794438a0eb411c84c4de7.gif]
Reply
#22
And yet you still have to learn all of these peoples philosophies in philosophy class
[Image: fN2sxqs.gif]
Reply
#23
(30-10-2025, 08:58 AM)Idec Wrote: And yet you still have to learn all of these peoples philosophies in philosophy class

It's history of philosophy, it's not called that but it's fair. My grade is my grade.
The most infamous and influential individual in the manosphere.
Reply
#24
(20-09-2024, 01:07 AM)Altruist Wrote: wittgenstein called his ramblings from the tractatus bullshit a couple of years later. still considered to be one of the greatest minds of the century. tells you everything you need to know about post-baconian philosophy

Philosophical investigation, not that 
It is not at all easy to assimilate knowledge from that book.
It is anti-midwit
Dark 
Reply
#25
(31-10-2025, 10:19 PM)Darkeningstar Wrote: Philosophical investigation, not that 
It is not at all easy to assimilate knowledge from that book.
It is anti-midwit

3.1/10 posting style aspiration
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different

Quote:[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]
Reply
#26
Luke Smith debunked Nietzsche
Reply
#27
(31-10-2025, 10:25 PM)RenXuan88 Wrote: Luke Smith debunked Nietzsche

When?
The most infamous and influential individual in the manosphere.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)