[Black Pill] Faggotry is the basis of civilization. Great minds like Plato knew this

[Mustang]

Join

[Lucy]

Ben Shapiro TRIGGERS Liberal by SENDING them to NAZI DEATH CAMPS using pure CONSERVATIVE LOGIC and REASONING and then ANGERS SJW by GOING on a RAMPAGE literally RAPING and MURDERING every single MINORITY within a 200 MILE RADIUS then TROLLS Libtard with TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME by licking Donald Trumps MICROPENIS of all the DRIED CUM from the CONCEPTION of Barron Trump and he ANGERS democrat by FEEDING upon the FLESH of ABORTED FETUSES and the BLOOD of EVERY single LIBTARD to literally BECOME a GOD AMONG MEN which TROLLS idiot COMMIES by OPENING the seals of HELL and CAUSING the APOCALYPSE in which the DEVIL RAPES CHILDREN and TEARS OFF the heads of Liberal TODDLERS and LITERALLY setting WOMEN’s RIGHTS a THOUSAND YEARS and also Ben TRIGGERS the SOCIALISTS by RAPING the UNDEAD CORPSE of LEON TROTSKY and JOSEPH STALIN and he PISSES OFF the LEFTISTS by ESTABLISHING a NEW WORLD ORDER in which he is the SUPREME GOD EMPEROR OF ALL OF THE AMERICAS, CHINA, EUROPE, BRITAIN, TAIWAN, and THAT RANDOM ISLAND IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PACIFIC OCEAN and MURDERS all POLITICAL DISSIDENTS within the government and then he LITERALLY summons CTHULHU and have home and the DEVIL FUCK HIM IN THE ASS while he CUMS all OVER the BOTTLE of LIBERAL TEARS and then he PRANKS Chink Ugayer by IMITATING him and literally dying from the ANAL WOUNDS from Literally being FUCKED IN THE ASS by SATAN and CTHULHU and then ENRAGES the COMMIES by RAPING GOD and BECOMING the NEW ABSOLUTE RULER OF THE UNIVERSE!!!!! (LIBERALS TROLLED) (NOT CLICKBAIT) (SJWs and FEMINISTS OWNED)

[Altruist]

Ben Shapiro TRIGGERS Liberal by SENDING them to NAZI DEATH CAMPS using pure CONSERVATIVE LOGIC and REASONING and then ANGERS SJW by GOING on a RAMPAGE literally RAPING and MURDERING every single MINORITY within a 200 MILE RADIUS then TROLLS Libtard with TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME by licking Donald Trumps MICROPENIS of all the DRIED CUM from the CONCEPTION of Barron Trump and he ANGERS democrat by FEEDING upon the FLESH of ABORTED FETUSES and the BLOOD of EVERY single LIBTARD to literally BECOME a GOD AMONG MEN which TROLLS idiot COMMIES by OPENING the seals of HELL and CAUSING the APOCALYPSE in which the DEVIL RAPES CHILDREN and TEARS OFF the heads of Liberal TODDLERS and LITERALLY setting WOMEN’s RIGHTS a THOUSAND YEARS and also Ben TRIGGERS the SOCIALISTS by RAPING the UNDEAD CORPSE of LEON TROTSKY and JOSEPH STALIN and he PISSES OFF the LEFTISTS by ESTABLISHING a NEW WORLD ORDER in which he is the SUPREME GOD EMPEROR OF ALL OF THE AMERICAS, CHINA, EUROPE, BRITAIN, TAIWAN, and THAT RANDOM ISLAND IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PACIFIC OCEAN and MURDERS all POLITICAL DISSIDENTS within the government and then he LITERALLY summons CTHULHU and have home and the DEVIL FUCK HIM IN THE ASS while he CUMS all OVER the BOTTLE of LIBERAL TEARS and then he PRANKS Chink Ugayer by IMITATING him and literally dying from the ANAL WOUNDS from Literally being FUCKED IN THE ASS by SATAN and CTHULHU and then ENRAGES the COMMIES by RAPING GOD and BECOMING the NEW ABSOLUTE RULER OF THE UNIVERSE!!!!! (LIBERALS TROLLED) (NOT CLICKBAIT) (SJWs and FEMINISTS OWNED)

i get triggered whenever i hear this midget's name. probably the only jew i wouldn't mind seeing gassed in a chamber

[ΛΟΓΟΣ]

[Bojack]

eww faggot btfo

[Idec]

Plato was also a pedo that thought age didn't matter, it only mattered if the you actually loved the young boy and he was intelligent.

[ΛΟΓΟΣ]

Plato was also a pedo that thought age didn't matter, it only mattered if the you actually loved the young boy and he was intelligent.

i highly doubt that. such great man would not condemn his own soul so easily, sounds bs

[machinelves]

i highly doubt that. such great man would not condemn his own soul so easily, sounds bs

[ΛΟΓΟΣ]

[Altruist]

solid bump

[ΛΟΓΟΣ]

plato was... hetero and not gay...

Very likely; I will endeavour to explain myself more clearly. When I came to the subject of education, I beheld
young men and maidens holding friendly intercourse with one another. And there naturally arose in my mind a sort of
apprehension - I could not help thinking how one is to deal with a city in which youths and maidens are well nurtured, and
have nothing to do, and are not undergoing the excessive and servile toils which extinguish wantonness, and whose only cares
during their whole life are sacrifices and festivals and dances. How, in such a state as this, will they abstain from desires which
thrust many a man and woman into perdition; and from which reason, assuming the functions of law, commands them to
abstain? The ordinances already made may possibly get the better of most of these desires; the prohibition of excessive
wealth is a very considerable gain in the direction of temperance, and the whole education of our youth imposes a law of
moderation on them; moreover, the eye of the rulers is required always to watch over the young, and never to lose sight of
them; and these provisions do, as far as human means can effect anything, exercise a regulating influence upon the desires in
general. But how can we take precautions against the unnatural loves of either sex, from which innumerable evils have come upon individuals and cities? How shall we devise a remedy and way of escape out of so great a danger? Truly, Cleinias, here is a difficulty. In many ways Crete and Lacedaemon furnish a great help to those who make peculiar laws; but in the matter of love, as we are alone, I must confess that they are quite against us. For if any one following nature should lay down the law which existed before the days of Laius, and denounce these lusts as contrary to nature, adducing the animals as a proof that such unions were monstrous, he might prove his point, but he would be wholly at variance with the custom of your states.

Further, they are repugnant to a principle which we say that a legislator should always observe; for we are always enquiring
which of our enactments tends to virtue and which not. And suppose we grant that these loves are accounted by law to the
honourable, or at least not disgraceful, in what degree will they contribute to virtue? Will such passions implant in the soul of
him who is seduced the habit of courage, or in the soul of the seducer the principle of temperance? Who will ever believe this?
or rather, who will not blame the effeminacy of him who yields to pleasures and is unable to hold out against them? Will not
all men censure as womanly him who imitates the woman? And who would ever think of establishing such a practice by law?
certainly no one who had in his mind the image of true law. How can we prove that what I am saying is true? He who would
rightly consider these matters must see the nature of friendship and desire, and of these so - called loves, for they are of two
kinds, and out of the two arises a third kind, having the same name; and this similarity of name causes all the difficulty and
obscurity.

Our citizens should not allow pleasures to strengthen with indulgence, but should by toil divert the aliment and
exuberance of them into other parts of the body; and this will happen if no immodesty be allowed in the practice of love. Then
they will be ashamed of frequent intercourse, and they will find pleasure, if seldom enjoyed, to be a less imperious mistress.
They should not be found out doing anything of the sort. Concealment shall be honourable, and sanctioned by custom and
made law by unwritten prescription; on the other hand, to be detected shall be esteemed dishonourable, but not, to abstain
wholly. In this way there will be a second legal standard of honourable and dishonourable, involving a second notion of right.
Three principles will comprehend all those corrupt natures whom we call inferior to themselves, and who form but one class,
and will compel them not to transgress.

The principle of piety, the love of honour, and the desire of beauty, not in the body but in the soul. These are,
perhaps, romantic aspirations; but they are the noblest of aspirations, if they could only be realised in all states, and, God
willing, in the matter of love we may be able to enforce one of two things - either that no one shall venture to touch any
person of the freeborn or noble class except his wedded wife, or sow the unconsecrated and bastard seed among harlots, or
in barren and unnatural lusts; or at least we may abolish altogether the connection of men with men; and as to women, if any
man has to do with any but those who come into his house duly married by sacred rites, whether they be bought or acquired
in any other way, and he offends publicly in the face of all mankind, we shall be right in enacting that he be deprived of civic
honours and privileges, and be deemed to be, as he truly is, a stranger. Let this law, then, whether it is one, or ought rather
to be called two, be laid down respecting love in general, and the intercourse of the sexes which arises out of the desires,
whether rightly or wrongly indulged.

[ΛΟΓΟΣ]

here Plato describes his vicious and masculine Athenian desire to stone faggots to death, and he says its God-willing to do so...

ATHENIAN: Upon reflection I see a way of imposing the law, which, in one respect, is easy, but, in another, is of the utmost

difficulty.

MEGILLUS: What do you mean?

ATHENIAN: We are all aware that most men, in spite of their lawless natures, are very strictly and precisely restrained from

intercourse with the fair, and this is not at all against their will, but entirely with their will.

MEGILLUS: When do you mean?

ATHENIAN: When any one has a brother or sister who is fair; and about a son or daughter the same unwritten law holds, and
is a most perfect safeguard, so that no open or secret connection ever takes place between them. Nor does the thought of
such a thing ever enter at all into the minds of most of them.

MEGILLUS: Very true.

ATHENIAN: Does not a little word extinguish all pleasures of that sort?

MEGILLUS: What word?

ATHENIAN: The declaration that they are unholy, hated of God, and most infamous; and is not the reason of this that no one
has ever said the opposite, but every one from his earliest childhood has heard men speaking in the same manner about them
always and everywhere, whether in comedy or in the graver language of tragedy? When the poet introduces on the stage a
Thyestes or an Oedipus, or a Macareus having secret intercourse with his sister, he represents him, when found out, ready to
kill himself as the penalty of his sin.

MEGILLUS: You are very right in saying that tradition, if no breath of opposition ever assails it, has a marvellous power.

ATHENIAN: Am I not also right in saying that the legislator who wants to master any of the passions which master man may
easily know how to subdue them? He will consecrate the tradition of their evil character among all, slaves and freemen,
women and children, throughout the city: that will be the surest foundation of the law which he can make.

MEGILLUS: Yes; but will he ever succeed in making all mankind use the same language about them?

ATHENIAN: A good objection; but was I not just now saying that I had a way to make men use natural love and abstain from

unnatural, not intentionally destroying the seeds of human increase, or sowing them in stony places, in which they will take no
root; and that I would command them to abstain too from any female field of increase in which that which is sown is not likely
to grow? Now if a law to this effect could only be made perpetual, and gain an authority such as already prevents intercourse
of parents and children - such a law, extending to other sensual desires, and conquering them, would be the source of ten
thousand blessings. For, in the first place, moderation is the appointment of nature, and deters men from all frenzy and
madness of love, and from all adulteries and immoderate use of meats and drinks, and makes them good friends to their own
wives. And innumerable other benefits would result if such a law could only be enforced. I can imagine some lusty youth who
is standing by, and who, on hearing this enactment, declares in scurrilous terms that we are making foolish and impossible
laws, and fills the world with his outcry. And therefore I said that I knew a way of enacting and perpetuating such a law,
which was very easy in one respect, but in another most difficult. There is no difficulty in seeing that such a law is possible,
and in what way; for, as I was saying, the ordinance once consecrated would master the soul of every man, and terrify him
into obedience. But matters have now come to such a pass that even then the desired result seems as if it could not be
attained, just as the continuance of an entire state in the practice of common meals is also deemed impossible. And although
this latter is partly disproven by the fact of their existence among you, still even in your cities the common meals of women
would be regarded as unnatural and impossible. I was thinking of the rebelliousness of the human heart when I said that the
permanent establishment of these things is very difficult.