considering josh, pp and rm are barely posting, i really doubt i'd be logging in here
#46
holy meltdown, lmao
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different

Quote:[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]
Reply
#47
also, just lol at the "negligence" part. there was no negligence involved (unless you're gonna use it as a "no true scotsman" fallacy here). it's just that the entire crypto scheme is nothing more than the most recent overhyped ponzi scheme. the second you touch someone with more resources than you (here: the government and transnational agencies dealing with cybercrime), if your breach if something they care enough about, you'll get exposed as easily as a bank robber who entered the bank while recording himself and streaming it online. just lol at you retards.
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different

Quote:[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]
Reply
#48
weren't you leaving after embarrassing yourself?

stop talking about your fictional case, it doesn't prove anything, it's literally not an argument

an argument would be to explain the vulnerabilities that give away your identity or clues about it, but you can't

I'd advice you to take it slow and start by learning how to send an email
Reply
#49
When you exchange items in a dark alley, it could be anonymous. But when you use computers it leaves a Digital Fingerprint.

This was confirmed by the inventor of Bitcoin Craig Wright who said: "The last thing BTC is is anonymous."
Reply
#50
(01-03-2025, 10:16 PM)Busty Doll Wrote: When you exchange items in a dark alley, it could be anonymous. But when you use computers it leaves a Digital Fingerprint.

This was confirmed by the inventor of Bitcoin Craig Wright who said: "The last thing BTC is is anonymous."

it's not anonymous because blockchain transactions are transparent, however bitcoin adressess are not connected to your physical identity, hence the used term "pseudonymous" meaning "falsely named"
Reply
#51
(01-03-2025, 10:29 PM)kathisterima Wrote: it's not anonymous because blockchain transactions are transparent, however bitcoin adressess are not connected to your physical identity, hence the used term "pseudonymous" meaning "falsely named"

If someone used a VPN and then committed terrorist offenses, would you say he's safe from the CIA?

The government always has the most powerful hacking software, that is why it's called government.

Therefore I don't believe the claims that BTC is a foolproof mask.
Reply
#52
(01-03-2025, 10:31 PM)Busty Doll Wrote: If someone used a VPN and then committed terrorist offenses, would you say he's safe from the CIA?

The government always has the most powerful hacking software, that is why it's called government.

Therefore I don't believe the claims that BTC is a foolproof mask.

stop talking about "hacking" as if it is some magic wand that penetrates everything. It doesn't work that way.

Even if you are using VPN and the identity of your IP address is 100% protected there are other clues that can lead back to you

think of the silkroad guy who had one post in a forum from 10 years before he got caught that revealed his personal email address

if there is a way to get you they will get you, but that does not mean they will bypass the laws of physics and do some abra kababra *hits enter button* and all your information including what you ate last month and what you fapped to 3 years ago will appear on some giant monitor like in the NCIS tv series.
Reply
#53
(01-03-2025, 10:45 PM)kathisterima Wrote: stop talking about "hacking" as if it is some magic wand that penetrates everything. It doesn't work that way.

Even if you are using VPN and the identity of your IP address is 100% protected there are other clues that can lead back to you

think of the silkroad guy who had one post in a forum from 10 years before he got caught that revealed his personal email address

if there is a way to get you they will get you, but that does not mean they will bypass the laws of physics and do some abra kababra *hits enter button* and all your information including what you ate last month and what you fapped to 3 years ago will appear on some giant monitor like in the NCIS tv series.

So in conclusion, it's not possible for Ayman Zawahiri to buy a bitcoin and then conduct untraceable phone calls.

He can be discovered by the authorities.

Therefore BTC has no value in pseudonymity
Reply
#54
successful thread. what a novel experience
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different

Quote:[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]
Reply
#55
would be good if you made sense for 1 time
Reply
#56
talking to dolly
Reply
#57
the amount of substantial claims of the retard who can't admin a functional forum in 2025 so far ITT: 0

but at least he knows what secret services are up to Giggle

can you even name the branches of the "government", retard? Giggle

(had to retype this post 3 times because of the glitches, but that definitely doesn't indicate its admin's doesn't exactly have any knowledge about crypto and CS in general Giggle)
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different

Quote:[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]
Reply
#58
(01-03-2025, 11:09 PM)kathisterima Wrote: talking to dolly

I'm the #1 bitcoin critic globally

All arguments have been dismantled and you can expect a drop to $0
Reply
#59
(01-03-2025, 11:18 PM)Busty Doll Wrote: I'm the #1 bitcoin critic globally

All arguments have been dismantled and you can expect a drop to $0

wrong! that's exactly what "the government" wants you to believe! secret services too, because they are all about keeping losers living off allowance and neetbux broke!

Jordan
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different

Quote:[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]
Reply
#60
just when you needed an ally to back you with solid arguments
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: