@slop slinger i have a philosophy question for you

[Hate]

no idea what you just said. there's clearly some overlap between the concepts as we make them and constituents of reality (at least as we perceive it, because the opposite would be paradoxical), the mistake lies in reversing that process and assuming something exists in nature in a certain way because it would fit our conceptualization

the relation between our current perception of "rationalist" axioms and earlier people's perception of religious dogmas is the fucking same. how is this not water and how do people still make the same mistake despite having a larger sample size than abrahamic religions' apologists beats me (speaking in general, not attacking you)

i agree with that 

[Altruist]

tfw almost came after reading pp's rep comment, even though it's blatantly incorrect - i've been throwing gems like this one around on a weekly basis since 2017 or so

[Altruist]

words downstream from concepts

words are approximations so are our thoughts

remind me to share my thoughts on this next week, when i m sober

[Busty Doll]

op effortlessly nuked to oblivion

He was never the sharpest sardines opener
   

[n9wiff]

Riley is giving einstein