Was kant right? Discuss

[slop slinger]

Kant

[kathisterima]

he kant be

[Dreckssau]

Ofc, look at the forehead on this guy.

[Honest]

started reading cpr and it's mostly trying to remember the definitions for the convoluted jargon he employs; and then having to decode each convoluted, enigmatic paragraph of jargon; and then, after having decoded it, realise that you completely disagree with the point he's trying to make

but because it is so enigmatic, most people have to rely on academics to make sense of the work for them. and because academics are generally naive, credulous, cerebral people, they tend to have an affinity for figures like kant

of course, in actuality, the chinaman of konigsberg is deserving of ridicule, and exists for us as a prime example of a self-deluded sophist

[Sexual chocolate]

His moral theory is garbage. Copr is something a 10 yo would know intuitively, he just formalised it.

[superiorpisspot234]

Cunt

[slop slinger]

started reading cpr and it's mostly trying to remember the definitions for the convoluted jargon he employs; and then having to decode each convoluted, enigmatic paragraph of jargon; and then, after having decoded it, realise that you completely disagree with the point he's trying to make

its ok to disagree

[slop slinger]

His moral theory is garbage. Copr is something a 10 yo would know intuitively, he just formalised it.

what does 10 yo know

[Insecurecel Incelcel]

his book is written bad because he rushed it when he was delirious and thought he was gonna die soon.

the fact everyone in that field is supposed to slog through it to be considered really understanding the material instead of just learning the principles through a secondary source shows how fake philosophy is

no physics or engineering student is doing that

[slop slinger]

his book is written bad because he rushed it when he was delirious and thought he was gonna die soon.

the fact everyone in that field is supposed to slog through it to be considered really understanding the material instead of just learning the principles through a secondary source shows how fake philosophy is

no physics or engineering student is doing that

what's written bad about it

[slop slinger]

thoughts on the distinction between phenomenon and noumenon?

[Sexual chocolate]

what does 10 yo know

Kant was brachy and his thoughts are worthless. Nietzsche had a better cranium

[slop slinger]

Kant was brachy and his thoughts are worthless. Nietzsche had a better cranium

Pseudoscience. Opinion discarded.

[Insecurecel Incelcel]

what's written bad about it

it's not in the official "for idiots" series

[Honest]

its ok to disagree

no shit, thats why i made the post