Sleep is key

[Sexual chocolate]

and you are still wrong about how everyones body works exactly the same all the time, which is what you were trying to imply no matter how you try weaseling around that fact

and stop acting like you were trying to just make general statements earlier using a personal pronoun when its clear you were specifically talking about yourself and (mistakenly) trying to extrapolate that to everyone else:


not sure why you feel the need to be a BIG BRAIN when it comes to health stuff. you would get more respect if you acted more humble instead of a know it all

It was a response to you claiming your problems were solely due to a brain issue , which I count retorted by stating in most cases it is actually bodily derived. Sorry if you lack comprehension issues

[M1NT]

It was a response to you claiming your problems were solely due to a brain issue , which I count retorted by stating in most cases it is actually bodily derived. Sorry if you lack comprehension issues

no its you that lacks comprehension issues, this is what I wrote earlier in our exchange:

yeah, when you are healthy, but different people have different bodies

the stance youre proposing is too binary, I think its more accurate to say that what youre proposing is true sometimes but not always and not in all cases

to which you replied:

No it applies even when I'm not healthy. Your brain is inextricably connected to your entire body.

you basically ignored my proposal for a more moderate stance and instead just kept advocating your extreme position. if you really felt as moderate as youre now claiming to be:

which I count retorted by stating in most cases it is actually bodily derived

then why didnt you just agree with me when I originally proposed a more moderate stance a few responses ago? we would have had nothing to disagree on, but instead you kept trying to argue your extreme stance. its disingenuous that youre now trying to backpedal and act as if you were being the reasonable one all along when this obviously isnt the case. you were being too broad with your statements, which I called you out on, and instead of admitting your error youre now trying to flip it around and act like im somehow the one who lacks comprehension lol

[n9wiff]

A duel of men

[Sexual chocolate]

no its you that lacks comprehension issues, this is what I wrote earlier in our exchange:


to which you replied:


you basically ignored my proposal for a more moderate stance and instead just kept advocating your extreme position. if you really felt as moderate as youre now claiming to be:


then why didnt you just agree with me when I originally proposed a more moderate stance a few responses ago? we would have had nothing to disagree on, but instead you kept trying to argue your extreme stance. its disingenuous that youre now trying to backpedal and act as if you were being the reasonable one all along when this obviously isnt the case. you were being too broad with your statements, which I called you out on, and instead of admitting your error youre now trying to flip it around and act like im somehow the one who lacks comprehension lol

Because saying most is not a moderate stance? It is laughable to suggest seriously to any physiologist worth his salt that disorders purely involve the brain and not the whole organism. Russians have known this for decades , while in America such a conception still exists in the public view downstream from descartes' metaphysics, although it has slowly been swept under the rug for pharmaceutical profits even though study after study has proven an intimate connection 

I don't know how a simple statement i made eludes your grasp and you're basically arguing for n=1 by saying " no I don't " think" I am the exception to the rule", basically an emotionally charged statement. You have made no case in your favour either except arguing against a general statement I made which is incontrovertible nowadays among medical circles. Sleep disorders alone could be adrenal driven , CNS fatigue driven etc.

[M1NT]

Because saying most is not a moderate stance?

as I said before:

which I count retorted by stating in most cases it is actually bodily derived

then why didnt you just agree with me when I originally proposed a more moderate stance a few responses ago? we would have had nothing to disagree on, but instead you kept trying to argue your extreme stance. its disingenuous that youre now trying to backpedal and act as if you were being the reasonable one all along when this obviously isnt the case. you were being too broad with your statements, which I called you out on, and instead of admitting your error youre now trying to flip it around and act like im somehow the one who lacks comprehension lol

I already answered this 

[Sexual chocolate]

as I said before:


I already answered this 

because "most" is not a moderate stance at all jfl? Do you think saying most crime is driven by blacks is a moderate stance?

[Honest]

unironically an extremely based post, thank you for posting this, you have inspired me (really). can you give me some tips for sleeping? I thought I had physiologically induced insomnia but now I realize its a psychological issue instead. kind of sounds like maybe your sleep issues were also psychologically based?

i spent way less time in front of screens throughout day, didnt use screen before bed, no caffeine from mid afternoon, set alarm that went off slightly earlier each day

[Honest]

drank alcohol friday and totally messed up my sleep. ive lost all my powers

[M1NT]

because "most" is not a moderate stance at all jfl? Do you think saying most crime is driven by blacks is a moderate stance?

I already clearly explained everything, you are being purposely obtuse and trying to make it appear as if you werent initially incorrect. I was always advocating a more nuanced stance in opposition to your extreme know it at all stance, as evidenced by this earlier comment:

https://bookism.net/showthread.php?tid=29673&pid=168430#pid168430

yeah, when you are healthy, but different people have different bodies

the stance youre proposing is too binary, I think its more accurate to say that what youre proposing is true sometimes but not always and not in all cases

you were initially taking extreme know it all stances and then later on tried to act as if you were making more measured moderate stances all along, but we both know this is untrue because if you actually were being as moderate the whole time as you later on claimed to be then why didnt you just agree with me when I was advocating for a more moderate stance from the beginning? we would have had nothing to disagree on. the fact that youre still trying to argue about this just shows that you were wrong, and you know you were wrong, but youre still trying to argue and muddy the waters to make it look like you werent wrong lol

[Sexual chocolate]

I already clearly explained everything, you are being purposely obtuse and trying to make it appear as if you werent initially incorrect. I was always advocating a more nuanced stance in opposition to your extreme know it at all stance, as evidenced by this earlier comment:

you were initially taking extreme know it all stances and then later on tried to act as if you were making more measured moderate stances all along, but we both know this is untrue because if you actually were being as moderate the whole time as you later on claimed to be then why didnt you just agree with me when I was advocating for a more moderate stance from the beginning? we would have had nothing to disagree on. the fact that youre still trying to argue about this just shows that you were wrong, and you know you were wrong, but youre still trying to argue and muddy the waters to make it look like you werent wrong lol

because most is not an adjective implying moderacy? 

[M1NT]

because most is not an adjective implying moderacy? 

"most" is more moderate than "X is true for me 100% of the time so it must be true 100% of the time for other people too"

youre being more moderate now with the word "most" than you were initially being when you were implying the meaning of "all" or "every"

[Sexual chocolate]

"most" is more moderate than "X is true for me 100% of the time so it must be true 100% of the time for other people too"

youre being more moderate now with the word "most" than you were initially being when you were implying the meaning of "all" or "every"

I made a general statement which by current medical standards 100 percent true (aside from big pharma bs). I then gave an instantiation of the principle with an anecdotal N size sample = 1 in me. 

In your case since you are negating my premise, what you are saying is you "think" your problem is 100 percent psychological which is again not true if deduced from my premise. I used the word "most" in the vein of , in most cases fixing the body fixes the mind. I never changed my initial position which was that the brain and the body are intimately connected.

[M1NT]

I made a general statement which by current medical standards 100 percent true (aside from big pharma bs). I then gave an instantiation of the principle with an anecdotal N size sample = 1 in me. 

In your case since you are negating my premise, what you are saying is you "think" your problem is 100 percent psychological which is again not true if deduced from my premise. I used the word "most" in the vein of , in most cases fixing the body fixes the mind. I never changed my initial position which was that the brain and the body are intimately connected.

the fact that you feel the need to use unnecessarily complex language suggests that you lack the ability to refute my prior responses and are instead hoping to obscure the actual discussion at hand through verbal sophistry. its not a good look bud, how old are you, like 20? 

>heh, if I talk all fancy like it will make me look BIG BRAIN and he wont know how to respond!

as I said before, youre sidestepping in order to avoid admitting you were wrong. I was always advocating a more moderate stance and you were continuously advocating a more extreme stance. you were initially talking in extremes and only later took up a more moderate stance which even you now admit to: 

"I used the word "most" in the vein of , in most cases fixing the body fixes the mind",

however in spite of admitting to taking up a more moderate stance, youre trying to qualify this by claiming that your initial position was always: "the brain and the body are intimately connected", however this is never what we were disagreeing about in the first place (and you know this). we were always disagreeing about the extreme degree to which you broadly apply this stance to everyone, we were never disagreeing about the fact theres an intimate brain and body connection in and of itself. this is a red herring that youre purposely throwing out to obfuscate the fact that you were wrong. to clarify, your original argument was:

sleep problems are always physiological in origin for every single person

my argument was:

you shouldnt make such a broad sweeping statement, sure some people have sleep problems that are physiological in nature but for others it might be psychological, what youre saying has some truth but its not true all the time and not in every single case

to recap, you initially came out with a very extreme stance and then walked it back and tried using a more moderate stance once you realized your original position was indefensible, however you tried (and are still trying) to cover up this fact

youre really insufferable btw. I dont respect you for your intellect because its obvious youre a pseud and youre arrogant. people would be much more willing to give you the validation you crave if you would just shove the BIG BRAIN schtick up your ass and act like a normal person instead of coming across like a know it all spaz

[sinn]

high dose progesterone, baking soda

130 iq

baking soda sleep is the best ever

progest e helps

[Altruist]

jfl at this normtard take

just sleep for 8 hours instead of 7 hours and 54 minutes (and keep yourself hydrated!!!) and your life will turn into a fairytale, bro!