Plato = You hate strict rules.
Aristotle = You're too jaded to see any value in virtues.
Epicurus = You're a Christian too stupid to admit to yourself you can't debunk his arguments. Likely a fan of JP.
Diogenes = You think it's impossible to control what you're satisfied with.
Aquinas = You came to hate Christianity.
Kant = You're not smart enough to understand him.
Hegel = Not really sure but you seem like you have good taste, or are Schopenhauer.
Schopenhauer = You don't like bad metaphysics or poorly thought out appeals to emotion as to why pessimism is right.
Nietzsche = You used to be a fan then realized every book turns into a hopeless trainwreck after the opening. Not just in terms of aesthetics and importance of ideas (e.g. writing about irrelevant confused garbage just to fill in the book) but in terms of substance, intelligence etc.
Heidegger = you hate sophistry and arguments that just can't really round themselves up properly.
Cioran = The only thing you hate more than the confusion of Schopenhauer is someone trying to copy him and exacerbating his flaws 10x while writing in the worst way possible.
Camus = You're the GOAT.
Sartre = Something about what he says debunks something about what you think. You're not happy about this.
Deluze = You really hate the idea that shizos are less conformist than the average person.
Nick Land = You're left wing OR hate the fact that he allegedly did drugs with friends that included a female OR hate racists OR hate china.
Aristotle = You're too jaded to see any value in virtues.
Epicurus = You're a Christian too stupid to admit to yourself you can't debunk his arguments. Likely a fan of JP.
Diogenes = You think it's impossible to control what you're satisfied with.
Aquinas = You came to hate Christianity.
Kant = You're not smart enough to understand him.
Hegel = Not really sure but you seem like you have good taste, or are Schopenhauer.
Schopenhauer = You don't like bad metaphysics or poorly thought out appeals to emotion as to why pessimism is right.
Nietzsche = You used to be a fan then realized every book turns into a hopeless trainwreck after the opening. Not just in terms of aesthetics and importance of ideas (e.g. writing about irrelevant confused garbage just to fill in the book) but in terms of substance, intelligence etc.
Heidegger = you hate sophistry and arguments that just can't really round themselves up properly.
Cioran = The only thing you hate more than the confusion of Schopenhauer is someone trying to copy him and exacerbating his flaws 10x while writing in the worst way possible.
Camus = You're the GOAT.
Sartre = Something about what he says debunks something about what you think. You're not happy about this.
Deluze = You really hate the idea that shizos are less conformist than the average person.
Nick Land = You're left wing OR hate the fact that he allegedly did drugs with friends that included a female OR hate racists OR hate china.
The most infamous and influential individual in the manosphere.

![[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]](https://i.ibb.co/8nqCLH50/Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookism-Edit-Buddy-and-Ignore-Lists.png)