28-02-2024, 12:03 AM
|
good iq puzzle (not scuffed like my pet's)
|
|
28-02-2024, 12:03 AM
28-02-2024, 12:23 AM
Quote:(not scuffed like my pet's) was this really necessary? not my fault my puzzles fly over your head i admit i made some mistakes before because i usually make these drunk, but the last one was perfectly fine, just not generic enough for you to understand it
28-02-2024, 12:30 AM
28-02-2024, 12:30 AM
considering your intellectual potential, you probably just stole one of the concepts i had used in my last couple of matrices of this type, so i'll pass
28-02-2024, 12:39 AM
what's the pattern?
28-02-2024, 12:42 AM
28-02-2024, 12:43 AM
28-02-2024, 12:49 AM
(28-02-2024, 12:03 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: ok so, two empty spots, with f3 being an anomaly (only black line) imply the puzzle is to be solved mostly horizontally. blue and red lines make a black line somehow. likely elements to solve this are angles, or rotation. perhaps an addition or rotation of lines does occur vertically, which is how you would extrapolate data to solve it horizontally ... am i on the right track?
28-02-2024, 12:49 AM
![]() every line (color + direction) appearing twice. considering the rule for solving these is that the simplest logically sound solution wins, consider yourself owned. - my pet from zagreb (one of the most elite parts of it)
28-02-2024, 12:51 AM
(28-02-2024, 12:49 AM)bluerose Wrote: ok so, two empty spots, with f3 being an anomaly (only black line) imply the puzzle is to be solved mostly horizontally. some
28-02-2024, 12:52 AM
(28-02-2024, 12:49 AM)just a guy from europe Wrote: you know deep down this is a poor solution...
28-02-2024, 12:55 AM
(28-02-2024, 12:52 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: you know deep down this is a poor solution... the only thing i know deep down is that i made you look like a clown, because you probably spent 45 minutes trying to come up with a contrived rotation and color-conversion based pattern p.s. my answer would be considered the winning one on every competition of this type. you fucked yourself over, you are not supposed to expose 3-4 banal solutions in these while trying to conceal the key. choose your battles more wisely, bro.
28-02-2024, 12:57 AM
28-02-2024, 01:00 AM
(28-02-2024, 12:55 AM)just a guy from europe Wrote: the only thing i know deep down is that i made you look like a clown, because you probably spent 45 minutes trying to come up with a contrived rotation and color-conversion based pattern no it wouldnt. look at bluerose's post for example, at a competition of this type they would be more insightful than just 'muh 2 of everything' not even mentioning that the blue vertical lines in #1 and #7 are clearly at different positions
28-02-2024, 01:02 AM
(28-02-2024, 01:00 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: no it wouldnt. look at bluerose's post for example, at a competition of this type they would be more insightful than just 'muh 2 of everything' inaccuracies in drawing are common in these. just lol if you're trying to imply that your pattern includes moving lines by 2-3 mm ![]() you lost, buddy. know your place. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|