are retards responsible for their actions? where is the threshold?
#1
why do we subsidize the existence of retards? wouldn't it be better just to kill them all? is there a grey area where you're not afforded sympathy for your level of retardation, but people still place all the same expectations on you?


would you have to point a gun at this kids forehead and pull the trigger while he smiles at you, blissfully ignorant of what's about to happen?

[Image: BrewerWeb.jpg]

these are the questions people will need to ask themselves as more and more people become redundant due to overpopulation/technology. might not even happen this century, but it will happen eventually
Reply
#2
the answer is that eugenics is only possible in dictatorships and we live in le democracy

but yeah imagine having an autistic children and having to deal with its tantrums everyday at 9am
Reply
#3
(20-02-2024, 11:10 AM)ΛΟΓΟΣ Wrote: the answer is that eugenics is only possible in dictatorships and we live in le democracy

but yeah imagine having an autistic children and having to deal with its tantrums everyday at 9am

yeah, i cant imagine having an autistic children


how would you define autism, btw? important because we've gone from 1 in 50,000 kids being diagnosed to 1 in 10, and obviously the criteria needs to be pretty strict if we're going to start murdering people based on it
Reply
#4
[Image: avatar_1242.png?dateline=1708401745]
Reply
#5
(20-02-2024, 11:36 AM)kathisterima Wrote: [Image: avatar_1242.png?dateline=1708401745]

[Image: 220px-Charles_Xavier_%28Patrick_Stewart%29.jpg]
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)