reminder: my pet was bashing crypto when bitcoin was ~$17,000 in Summer 2022

[bluerose]

the state doesn't need to adopt crypto for it to be viable. it has intrinsic functionality and advantages over other asset classes that will always make it useful and in demand. people who bash this stuff are just npcs and boomers invested into valueless fiat.

what do you do when you open your crypto wallet and realize it's empty, when you had a million $ worth of coins in it yesterday?

remember, the police, the judiciary and the government have nothing to do with this and have no means, the budget and the authority to act on it.

ur too nice

[Altruist]

nice try at defending him, he's not an expert in epistemology or law.


cute!

is this a serious claim or just another attempt of yours to get my attention?

not that i need your reply to get my answer, but ... you aren't exactly reading journals publishing papers in those fields, are you?

[Altruist]

the state doesn't need to adopt crypto for it to be viable. it has intrinsic functionality and advantages over other asset classes that will always make it useful and in demand. people who bash this stuff are just npcs and boomers invested into valueless fiat.

what do you do when you open your crypto wallet and realize it's empty, when you had a million $ worth of coins in it yesterday?

remember, the police, the judiciary and the government have nothing to do with this and have no means, the budget and the authority to act on it.

ur too nice

you misspelled sexy

[slop slinger]

nice try at defending him, he's not an expert in epistemology or law.


cute!

is this a serious claim or just another attempt of yours to get my attention?

not that i need your reply to get my answer, but ... you aren't exactly reading journals publishing papers in those fields, aren't you?

It was just an attempt to get attention

[slop slinger]

nice try at defending him, he's not an expert in epistemology or law.


cute!

I was about to write cute in reply to your post then you edited that in o.o

all cuntmoidfags share a single brain cell

(Un)fortunately, for us our brains are also a kind of prison cell


Sincerely
unrepentant wordcel(l)

[Altruist]

also, since we're on reminders already ... remind me how much money you've made from crypto so far and give me data on the net financial results of all crypto users globally. the easiest way to make me sound like an idiot and end this conversation once and for all. i believe i dont need to also remind you that, if that market is as bullet-proof as you claim it is, you should easily be able to find credible data on it, since it's even possible for the demons of this world - credit institutions (google it if it confuses you i didnt use the term "banks" here)

- just a guy from europe

~$20,000

how much do you make with your job monthly and where is that money now?

~$5000 but after tax, loans, rent, etc there's only like $1.5k left. i save 2/3, invest 1/3. should proaby invest more tbh

meaning the spending is done by your parents. QfuckingED.

[bluerose]

nice try at defending him, he's not an expert in epistemology or law.


cute!

is this a serious claim or just another attempt of yours to get my attention?

not that i need your reply to get my answer, but ... you aren't exactly reading journals publishing papers in those fields, are you?

I think you would easily epistemology mog my pet if you tried, then law is just largely outdated ways to protect personal rights of citizens.

no wonder my pet has this hunger for academia tier theorizing, he realizes his field is largely removed from true intellectual discourse, like bark around a tree.

personal rights, that's a beautiful theme, tho, I think he agrees, hence his theatrical nature, calling himself altruist and all that, his best alt name btw.

[Altruist]

nice try at defending him, he's not an expert in epistemology or law.


cute!

is this a serious claim or just another attempt of yours to get my attention?

not that i need your reply to get my answer, but ... you aren't exactly reading journals publishing papers in those fields, are you?

I think you would easily epistemology mog my pet if you tried, then law is just largely outdated ways to protect personal rights of citizens.

no wonder my pet has this hunger for academia tier theorizing, he realizes his field is largely removed from true intellectual discourse, like bark around a tree.

personal rights, that's a beautiful theme, tho, I think he agrees, hence his theatrical nature, calling himself altruist and all that, his best alt name btw.

1. you quoted me instead of slop
2. "law is just largely outdated ways to protect personal rights of citizens" - this disqualifies you as a serious interlocutor about law more than saying 2+2 equals 2445.25 would do the same for math
3. "he realizes his field is largely removed from true intellectual discourse, like bark around a tree." - so blatantly stupid it's obvious that this is is just your desperate attempt to get an emotional reaction out of me. quality exchange of legal briefs between elite lawyers requires more iq/intellect than producing ramblings 90% of hard science papers are based on
4. "personal rights, that's a beautiful theme," - there's no such thing as "personal rights" in law (not that you'll understand or have any clue about this, but, by "law", i'm referring to both the common law and the civil law system), unless i've been so drugged out that i've missed the fact that we're all living in peak SSSR and posting on a forum funded by the KGB. just fucking lol. see 3. and magnify it by 5. it takes having read 3 news articles about unfair verdicts to know it's "civil rights", and definitely not "personal" rights as you are imagining it.

I think he agrees

the value of your thoughts about me agreeing with the preposterous bullshit you've written earlier in this post is not exactly existent in any meaningful sense of the word

[Altruist]

nice try at defending him, he's not an expert in epistemology or law.


cute!

is this a serious claim or just another attempt of yours to get my attention?

not that i need your reply to get my answer, but ... you aren't exactly reading journals publishing papers in those fields, are you?

I think you would easily epistemology mog my pet if you tried

too bad this isn't a matter of "trying". you're forgetting yourself when making these bold claims. what's your level of education again? because, unlike you, slop has demonstrated he's extremely educated, no matter how much i tease him about it

[fdeshieldplus]

the state doesn't need to adopt crypto for it to be viable. it has intrinsic functionality and advantages over other asset classes that will always make it useful and in demand. people who bash this stuff are just npcs and boomers invested into valueless fiat.

dear god. another broke loser.

what do you do when you open your crypto wallet and realize it's empty, when you had a million $ worth of coins in it yesterday?

remember, the police, the judiciary and the government have nothing to do with this and have no means, the budget or the authority to act on it, because it's so beautifully fucking "decentralized", "intermediator-free" and "untrackable".

p.s. using words like intrinsic and inherent when trying to make a point is a retard-midwit-ranged trait

it's all based on maths and cryptography, so unless the police have access to quantum computing from the year 2250, they won't be able to seize anything. i have memorized my seed phrase, it's impossible to access my coins.

also you can launder it using monero so it's not possible to for to trace the coins back to you.

[MysteriousWeeb420]

~$20,000

how much do you make with your job monthly and where is that money now?

~$5000 but after tax, loans, rent, etc there's only like $1.5k left. i save 2/3, invest 1/3. should proaby invest more tbh

meaning the spending is done by your parents. QfuckingED.

huh?

[fdeshieldplus]

how are you going to take 500k worth of gold into cayman brac? if you had bitcoin, you could even hitch a ride on a transport ship and no government in the world would have detected your movement, much less a transfer of a single dollar, yet you have access to 500k worth of bitcoin. it's things like that which make bitcoin superior to any other currency/asset on the planet. how are you going to transport your 1million dollar house away from natural disasters, civil unrest, war? sleeping in a car or van is a superior form of living compared to a house.

[Altruist]

how much do you make with your job monthly and where is that money now?

~$5000 but after tax, loans, rent, etc there's only like $1.5k left. i save 2/3, invest 1/3. should proaby invest more tbh

meaning the spending is done by your parents. QfuckingED.

huh?

pretty sure you got me

either way ... when you say you ve made 20k so far, are you using the sports betting addicts' logic where they tell themselves they've earned, (random figures), 5k after having invested 25k in total and winning 5k-worth of bets in the process, or normal logic? because, considering how insignificant 20k is for your country's standards, you could have made more money with random low-effort side-jobs that would take you less time and effort than obsessing over the crypto market fluctuations 12 times per day for years

i get it perfectly that it's psychologically more pleasant to make that shitty money by sitting in front of the screen and wasting your mouse's batteries, but ... still, none of this actually gives me the answer you're trying to convince me is true - that this is the way to go for the global economy in general, when you add pluses and minuses of every participating player to the equation. 

for the millionth time - what happens to that obscene system when a couple of hacker groupations (that will probably be hired and paid by traditional big capital-owners, ironically) take over and empty e-wallets of 99.9999999999999999% of guys like you over night, with none of you having neither legal nor factual possibility of fighting those who robbed you because, as you're proudly stating in your psychosis, the crypto currency system set you free of the terror of governmental agencies and financial institutions?

i mean ... just stop at this point, lmao. you are smarter than this

[MysteriousWeeb420]

~$5000 but after tax, loans, rent, etc there's only like $1.5k left. i save 2/3, invest 1/3. should proaby invest more tbh

meaning the spending is done by your parents. QfuckingED.

huh?

pretty sure you got me

either way ... when you say you ve made 20k so far, are you using the sports betting addicts' logic where they tell themselves they've earned, (random figures), 5k after having invested 25k in total and winning 5k-worth of bets in the process, or normal logic? because, considering how insignificant 20k is for your country's standards, you could have made more money with random low-effort side-jobs that would take you less time and effort than obsessing over the crypto market fluctuations 12 times per day for years

but i get it perfectly that it's psychologically more pleasant to make that shitty money by sitting in front of the screen and wasting your mouse's batteries

still, none of this actually gives the answer you're trying to convince me is true - that this is the way to go for the global economy in general, when you add pluses and minuses of every participating player to the equation

i mean ... just stop at this point, lmao. you are smarter than this

just watch how things develop over the next decade

[bluerose]

nice try at defending him, he's not an expert in epistemology or law.


cute!

is this a serious claim or just another attempt of yours to get my attention?

not that i need your reply to get my answer, but ... you aren't exactly reading journals publishing papers in those fields, are you?

I think you would easily epistemology mog my pet if you tried, then law is just largely outdated ways to protect personal rights of citizens.

no wonder my pet has this hunger for academia tier theorizing, he realizes his field is largely removed from true intellectual discourse, like bark around a tree.

personal rights, that's a beautiful theme, tho, I think he agrees, hence his theatrical nature, calling himself altruist and all that, his best alt name btw.

1. you quoted me instead of slop
2. "law is just largely outdated ways to protect personal rights of citizens" - this disqualifies you as a serious interlocutor about law more than saying 2+2 equals 2445.25 would do the same for math
3. "he realizes his field is largely removed from true intellectual discourse, like bark around a tree." - so blatantly stupid it's obvious that this is is just your desperate attempt to get an emotional reaction out of me. quality exchange of legal briefs between elite lawyers requires more iq/intellect than producing ramblings 90% of hard science papers are based on
4. "personal rights, that's a beautiful theme," - there's no such thing as "personal rights" in law (not that you'll understand or have any clue about this, but, by "law", i'm referring to both the common law and the civil law system), unless i've been so drugged out that i've missed the fact that we're all living in peak SSSR and posting on a forum funded by the KGB. just fucking lol. see 3. and magnify it by 5. it takes having read 3 news articles about unfair verdicts to know it's "civil rights", and definitely not "personal" rights as you are imagining it.

I think he agrees

the value of your thoughts about me agreeing with the preposterous bullshit you've written earlier in this post is not exactly existent in any meaningful sense of the word

personal rights, with human rights at their core, are what ur entire field is based on and what makes it special.

u expose urself as a bad intellectual by attacking that for muh certificates and ig moggery cred.