thinking about returning to looksmax

[Altruist]

slop is our love child, don't involve him 

ye idk. 
i'm really depressed and fooked.

and uuhh, idc about da normie paradigm of success, hence your personal paradigm, which slaves to that, also eliciting zero feelings, jfl if you think you're getting even a single molecule of cortisol out of me.

i'd even believe that if you didnt just reduce the chances this is true to 0 with this coping failures-only "school is for stupid losers" attitude (while also keeping the delusion that you are smart because you are spamming tryhard overly verbose attempts at psychoanalyses online)

[bluerose]

idk, i just wanna be happy.

i have a best friend, we will travel in the next two years for sure.

[Altruist]

idk, i just wanna be happy.

i have a best friend, we will travel in the next two years for sure.

read wittgenstein

[bluerose]

idk, i just wanna be happy.

i have a best friend, we will travel in the next two years for sure.

read wittgenstein

I looked up wittgenstein and happiness for you.
idk, he's right, but why would I read him, I am not a straggot who has to channel his cocklust into studying blocks of wood which might as well be genetic high pedigree code.

idk, 
do you think I am so cringe?

[Altruist]

idk, i just wanna be happy.

i have a best friend, we will travel in the next two years for sure.

read wittgenstein

I looked up wittgenstein and happiness for you.
idk, he's right, but why would I read him, I am not a straggot who has to channel his cocklust into studying blocks of wood which might as well be genetic high pedigree code.

idk, 
do you think I am so cringe?

far from that, just reminding you you are talking to a guy who wrestles with lawyers of major european banks on a daily basis, so you dont exactly stand a chance in verbal gymnastics-based discussions with me unless i'm really drunk

[Altruist]

bluerose
(Member)



Registration Date: 20-08-2023
Date of Birth: Not Specified
Local Time: 01-02-2024 at 22:36
Status: Online (Replying to Thread thinking about returning to looksmax @ 22:34) 




know when to stop, ffs

[bluerose]

idk, i just wanna be happy.

i have a best friend, we will travel in the next two years for sure.

read wittgenstein

I looked up wittgenstein and happiness for you.
idk, he's right, but why would I read him, I am not a straggot who has to channel his cocklust into studying blocks of wood which might as well be genetic high pedigree code.

idk, 
do you think I am so cringe?

far from that, just reminding you you are talking to a guy who wrestles with lawyers of major european banks on a daily basis, so you dont exactly stand a chance in verbal gymnastics-based discussions with me unless i'm really drunk

idk, I feel like I disappointed you ... 
by not being able to make myself motivated or happy, thus no irl ambitions ...

[Altruist]

read wittgenstein

I looked up wittgenstein and happiness for you.
idk, he's right, but why would I read him, I am not a straggot who has to channel his cocklust into studying blocks of wood which might as well be genetic high pedigree code.

idk, 
do you think I am so cringe?

far from that, just reminding you you are talking to a guy who wrestles with lawyers of major european banks on a daily basis, so you dont exactly stand a chance in verbal gymnastics-based discussions with me unless i'm really drunk

idk, I feel like I disappointed you ... 
by not being able to make myself motivated or happy, thus no irl ambitions ...

i really, really dont care, it was just necessary to point that out in response to your post

[Altruist]

literally unbearable, even persons like slop and my pet barely qualify as sentient enough to tickle me nowadays, I expect a lot more now in my twenties than I did when I was a teen on lookism.

ari and dollybuster, also, I'm numb but it kinda hits da spot, still.


meanwhile looksmaxx is if under_18 lookism posters opened their own hostile tribe to the OGs like in lord of the flies.
what would I be, their nanny?

you and slop would really get nothing from posting there, lmfao

even i'm borderline, and i'm a basic normalfag in my soul

[bluerose]

I looked up wittgenstein and happiness for you.
idk, he's right, but why would I read him, I am not a straggot who has to channel his cocklust into studying blocks of wood which might as well be genetic high pedigree code.

idk, 
do you think I am so cringe?

far from that, just reminding you you are talking to a guy who wrestles with lawyers of major european banks on a daily basis, so you dont exactly stand a chance in verbal gymnastics-based discussions with me unless i'm really drunk

idk, I feel like I disappointed you ... 
by not being able to make myself motivated or happy, thus no irl ambitions ...

i really, really dont care, it was just necessary to point that out in response to your post

i'm not useless if I can be happy, I thought u agreed with wittgenstein on that.


from a reddit thread:

*"ACCORDING TO WITTGENSTEIN, the worthwhile life is one that is lived happily. He feels such a life needs no justification, for it is justified in itself. He says, "I keep on coming back to this! simply the happy life is good, the unhappy bad. And if I now ask myself: But why should I live happily, then this of itself seems to me to be a tautological question; the happy life seems to be justified, of itself, it seems that it is the only right life."2 This is why he issues the imperative, "Live happily!"

[Altruist]

far from that, just reminding you you are talking to a guy who wrestles with lawyers of major european banks on a daily basis, so you dont exactly stand a chance in verbal gymnastics-based discussions with me unless i'm really drunk

idk, I feel like I disappointed you ... 
by not being able to make myself motivated or happy, thus no irl ambitions ...

i really, really dont care, it was just necessary to point that out in response to your post

i'm not useless if I can be happy, I thought u agreed with wittgenstein on that.


from a reddit thread:

*"ACCORDING TO WITTGENSTEIN, the worthwhile life is one that is lived happily. He feels such a life needs no justification, for it is justified in itself. He says, "I keep on coming back to this! simply the happy life is good, the unhappy bad. And if I now ask myself: But why should I live happily, then this of itself seems to me to be a tautological question; the happy life seems to be justified, of itself, it seems that it is the only right life."2 This is why he issues the imperative, "Live happily!"

wittgenstein was a schizophrenic fag who changed his opinion on the topics of his interest every two weeks. no idea where did you find this negative iq interpretation of his writings (read the prologue to tractatus), but this is from the period where he made at least some sense:

[bluerose]

idk, I feel like I disappointed you ... 
by not being able to make myself motivated or happy, thus no irl ambitions ...

i really, really dont care, it was just necessary to point that out in response to your post

i'm not useless if I can be happy, I thought u agreed with wittgenstein on that.


from a reddit thread:

*"ACCORDING TO WITTGENSTEIN, the worthwhile life is one that is lived happily. He feels such a life needs no justification, for it is justified in itself. He says, "I keep on coming back to this! simply the happy life is good, the unhappy bad. And if I now ask myself: But why should I live happily, then this of itself seems to me to be a tautological question; the happy life seems to be justified, of itself, it seems that it is the only right life."2 This is why he issues the imperative, "Live happily!"

wittgenstein was a schizophrenic fag who changed his opinion on the topics of his interest every two weeks. no idea where did you find this negative iq interpretation of his writings (read the prologue to tractatus), but this is from the period where he made at least some sense:

oh yeah that was infamous.
he later changed his opinion.

proof I iq-mog you, effortless victory! 

[Altruist]

i really, really dont care, it was just necessary to point that out in response to your post

i'm not useless if I can be happy, I thought u agreed with wittgenstein on that.


from a reddit thread:

*"ACCORDING TO WITTGENSTEIN, the worthwhile life is one that is lived happily. He feels such a life needs no justification, for it is justified in itself. He says, "I keep on coming back to this! simply the happy life is good, the unhappy bad. And if I now ask myself: But why should I live happily, then this of itself seems to me to be a tautological question; the happy life seems to be justified, of itself, it seems that it is the only right life."2 This is why he issues the imperative, "Live happily!"

wittgenstein was a schizophrenic fag who changed his opinion on the topics of his interest every two weeks. no idea where did you find this negative iq interpretation of his writings (read the prologue to tractatus), but this is from the period where he made at least some sense:

oh yeah that was infamous.
he later changed his opinion.

proof I iq-mog you, effortless victory! 

the one i quoted was good, the one you copied was literally meaningless in both the linguistic and the philosophical sense

[bluerose]

i'm not useless if I can be happy, I thought u agreed with wittgenstein on that.


from a reddit thread:

*"ACCORDING TO WITTGENSTEIN, the worthwhile life is one that is lived happily. He feels such a life needs no justification, for it is justified in itself. He says, "I keep on coming back to this! simply the happy life is good, the unhappy bad. And if I now ask myself: But why should I live happily, then this of itself seems to me to be a tautological question; the happy life seems to be justified, of itself, it seems that it is the only right life."2 This is why he issues the imperative, "Live happily!"

wittgenstein was a schizophrenic fag who changed his opinion on the topics of his interest every two weeks. no idea where did you find this negative iq interpretation of his writings (read the prologue to tractatus), but this is from the period where he made at least some sense:

oh yeah that was infamous.
he later changed his opinion.

proof I iq-mog you, effortless victory! 

the one i quoted was good, the one you copied was literally meaningless in both the linguistic and the philosophical sense

why do you think it is good.
o.o
srs

quote is not even an oxymoron in itself, for bragging purposes he says he is wise yet denies wisdom, then it is even more bragging with describing pain tolerance as high pedigree via an implied self-directed ad hominem, as a troubled philosopher turned celeb.

[Altruist]

wittgenstein was a schizophrenic fag who changed his opinion on the topics of his interest every two weeks. no idea where did you find this negative iq interpretation of his writings (read the prologue to tractatus), but this is from the period where he made at least some sense:

oh yeah that was infamous.
he later changed his opinion.

proof I iq-mog you, effortless victory! 

the one i quoted was good, the one you copied was literally meaningless in both the linguistic and the philosophical sense

why do you think it is good.
o.o
srs

quote is not even an oxymoron in itself, for bragging purposes he says he is wise yet denies wisdom, then it is even more bragging with describing pain tolerance as high pedigree via an implied self-directed ad hominem, as a troubled philosopher turned celeb.

would take me too much energy to elaborate

but does anyone except retard-tier religious people think we exist to experience bliss from womb to tomb? in fact, not even those people believe that, they tell themselves their struggle is gonna pay off when they drop dead and shit themselves