a question

[Altruist]

Some libertarians argue that residents, homeowner associations, cooperatives, or road-user groups could purchase and manage road networks.

Some advocate a "night-watchman" state that would intervene to maintain essential infrastructure if markets failed.

The rest of the answers chatgpt gave me are the free market would fix it or travel would be impossible 

So basically reinstate the government or wait for a new owner to come along

Why is it every libertarian has a passive income source as well? Surely dolly buster realises that in his fantasy world he wouldn't be able to manipulate numbers on a screen to make money, he'd actually have to add value to society, if a gypsy doesn't kill him first

i added 6. because he'd try to dodge the question by a super funny reply like "i would just buy a helicopter or a private plane and travel like that". 

it worked, because his reply basically reads as "BRAIN MALFUNCTION ALERT! BRAIN MALFUNCTION ALERT!". Reading that reply was a very pleasant experience for me.

[Busty Doll]

imagine this:
1. taxes don't exist
2. everything you see, all the infrastructure in the country is built and owned by private corporations
3. there is a number of corporations owning all the, for example, roads in the country
4. for some reason or for different reasons, all those corporations fail and suddenly there is not a single corporation providing road traveling service
5. railroads have been completely abandoned by now, because one thought it would be profitable and sustainable as a business model
6. there are airports everywhere and a bunch of companies providing access to them as their most important service, but they are aware of the situation, so they are charging insane amounts for you just to land on their airport and keep your aircraft there for a couple of hours, let alone longer. there are also capacity limitations, so they can't exactly have 200 planes and helicopters there at once, leading to even higher prices. you are completely powerless against them and their terms because their prices are set by the invisible hand of the market; the government intervening would mean regression to the most fundamental and brutal communist/socialist regime imaginable.

how do you get to work/relatives/a girlfriend/tourist destinations/any place you want to visit?

I get there by free market means.

Similar to "how I would get a phone, if it wasn't for the Soviet Phone Company."

Simple, I would buy an iPhone.

If you're in the mood to educate yourself on how everything including oceans and courts could be privatized, an old git called Walter Block has numerous YouTube classes on it.

[You're dead]

Everything is done better by the free market. An insane amount of progress has been Missed Out On by humanity, due to socialism

Taxes are what enabled us to land on the moon. What progress are you talking about? Just be honest, you want to keep more of your money to buy stockings and dildos. 

How would you be accelerating progress in the lolbert fantasy where the money you saved on taxes now goes towards dragon dildos and tranny apperal

If you cared about progress you'd donate your money

[Busty Doll]

Taxes are what enabled us to land on the moon. What progress are you talking about? Just be honest, you want to keep more of your money to buy stockings and dildos. 

How would you be accelerating progress in the lolbert fantasy where the money you saved on taxes now goes towards dragon dildos and tranny apperal

If you cared about progress you'd donate your money

In the year 1910, Rockefeller had $300 billion.

In the year 2010, Gates had $80 billion.

The regression is palpable

[Altruist]

I get there by free market means.

But what is the mean? It's really, really, not a complicated question. You want to go on vacation, a business meeting, visit a girlfriend, a dying family member, visit monaco alone like the biggest loser on the planet, go to school or job, you name it.

How do you get there?

Your answer is to buy a phone and, from then on, never ever leave your home again and just do video-calls? That's your superior alternative to being "robbed" of x% of your money in exchange for using stuff millions other people paid for building and taking care of too?

Hopefully you realize this is just one example. In the reality you are advocating for, you'd be slapped with dozens, if not hundreds of similar issues, which would lead to your quality of life going to complete shit. Oh, and you wouldn't get to be that rich guy in that system anymore, because you'd have to pay for stuff you don't even know you are using atm, and for insane prices. Litigation if you get fucked over? Your dravidian of a lawyer would have to compete with a jewish billionaire lawyer who goes to dinners with the judge who would have to provide the ruling on a weekly basis.

You sound like a child when talking about this stuff because of your lack of education. Which you didn't need because, as i said, you were born into some cow-milk transporting business owner's family so now you have to keep telling yourself all this absurd shit because the alternative would be you actually proving yourself on free market. Yourself.

[Busty Doll]

But what is the mean? It's really, really, not a complicated question. You want to go on vacation, a business meeting, visit a girlfriend, a dying family member, visit monaco alone like the biggest loser on the planet, go to school or job, you name it.

How do you get there?

Your answer is to buy a phone and, from then on, never ever leave your home again and just do video-calls?

No, I would hop on a plane, by an airline called Private Inc.

You present a case where communism has died overnight, and before a new structure emerges, you insist a plane should take off. If that fails, you use it as proof that markets don't exist.

[Altruist]

In the year 1910, Rockefeller had $300 billion.

In the year 2010, Gates had $80 billion.

The regression is palpable

In the year 1910, there were 20 "Rockfellers".

In the year 2010, there were 200 000 "Gates'".

The only palpable thing here is your constant failing to make a coherent point using these cringy pseudo humorous analogies.

[Busty Doll]

In the year 1910, there were 20 "Rockfellers".

In the year 2010, there are 200 000 "Gates'".

The only palpable thing here is your constant failing to make a coherent point using these cringy pseudo humorous analogies.

Just use the known fact that Ferrari is better than Moskvitch and apply it across the board

[Altruist]

No need for fictional scenarios. Look no further than telecommunication companies.

telecommunication companies what?

[Busty Doll]

telecommunication companies what?

When the government failed in Somalia, the result was: cheapest mobile subscriptions in the world

[Altruist]

Just use the known fact that Ferrari is better than Moskvitch and apply it across the board

I did. Nothing that would change the course of this conversation changed. Now it's your turn again, but it would be nice if you made a claim without hiding behind strawmen, shit humor and false analogies for once.

[Busty Doll]

I did. 

Well, now you know how Every Realm of Human Endeavor is better under a capitalistic regime

[Winyan Numpa]

i hike wit a stick

[slop slinger]

ust be honest, you want to keep more of your money to buy stockings and dildos. 

How would you be accelerating progress in the lolbert fantasy where the money you saved on taxes now goes towards dragon dildos and tranny apperal

[Altruist]

When the government failed in Somalia, the result was: cheapest mobile subscriptions in the world

Who on god's earth is talking about governments failing because of wars, you drooling retard?

We are talking about a scenario where a country politically, in its legislative body (these are now multimillionaires per se because "ordinary" politicians cant be paid anymore because no tax-funding, and they have to make money for a living somehow; i'm sure such a parliament roster would lead to humanization and progress of society in favor of the most, btw), decides to btfo taxes, destroys/privatizes THE ENTIRE INFRASTRUCTURE and starts over, using a system where you can't even take a walk in the park without someone charging you 250 EUR for it. For a walk. And then 280 EUR for a walk. And then 10 EUR for a step.

I mean you know I know what you are doing, and we both know why you are doing it.