27-03-2023, 04:43 PM
(27-03-2023, 04:39 PM)brocode Wrote:(27-03-2023, 04:36 PM)10khitman Wrote:(27-03-2023, 04:29 PM)brocode Wrote:(27-03-2023, 04:25 PM)10khitman Wrote: the way we naturally build cities and construct socities is fundamentally through burning villages and genocide. end result of human coexistence may be beautiful but the process can be disconnected from the end result. everything "good" must comes sin and impurity, its the ironic dichotomy of consciousness
disagree, we get to prosper as humans. is it a sin if its for our own good?
u did not just vindicate burning villages as morally positive bcuz its for the "greater good"
ur moral ideation is too numerical, computer-like
i didnt say that
i didnt call for "burning humans". like developing villages into cities, thats what i inferred u figuratively meant.
but if u literally meant burning villages, of course i condem it and it is not right
no i meant societies are literally built from pillaging and mass murder
im not saying sex is equivalent to those things in terms of moral magnitude, but im making a comparison in logic, in that just because the end product of some action is "beautiful" it does not render the process by which it was reached beautiful or good.
I understand ur point but i think its just not linear like that. sex is not a selfless act, its utilitary and self serving, nobody thinks time to have sex bcuz we wanna make something beautiful, they think i want to achieve pleasure from using this human, its inherently greedy, selfish, prideful, (lustful)
"Show me your looks and I'll show you your future"
