24-03-2023, 08:44 PM
(24-03-2023, 07:53 PM)Lucy Wrote:(24-03-2023, 06:39 PM)Born2Mog Wrote: true tbhs but i would argue more foundational is the technological/economical/society system that necessitated traditional gender roles
trying to artifically "preserve" either is ultimately doomed, though probably possible with power not ever going to be available.
each role is assigned by strenght and skill/mental prowess. even in sufficiently technologically advanced societies Women are simply not fit for the roles that are given to Men, they can at best be in superior aristocratic positions but still not ideal for ruling
the only "ruling" that occurs in 2023 is in a handful of shitholes with a combined gdp smaller than western city of population 100k
its all institutional
mayb they couldn't rule a mongol/cossack horde
cixi, maria theresa, the cathrines, mary, the elizabeths, isabelle, ect debunk roles arguement
is a woman worse than a man in being a president? no
is a woman worse than a man in being a CEO? no
is a woman worse than a man in being a judge? no
is a woman worse than a man in being an internet autism poster? no, try making it big on witchtok
is a woman worse than a man in being a drill instructor? on average yes
