14-03-2023, 06:45 PM
(14-03-2023, 05:29 AM)AlbanianLegend1994 Wrote:aliens probably intervened in human evolution tbh, better proven than the jigsaw puzzle of monkey femur and dildo shape cave rocks.(14-03-2023, 04:29 AM)Born2Mog Wrote: legit nature arguments when cold-adapted northern societies w/meat + grains consumption were probably the least natural, politically overorganized, high cortisol metnally ill war obsession societies to ever exist. average person had life quality of a squirrel.
compare to the fruit eater who just chills all day sing songs and holds cool parties
Fruit is pretty much a dopamine food while high fatty meats are the closest thing to a natural "copium" (not saying i don't enjoy)
i'm not even convinced of existence of Paleolithic man tbh
btw never got why it called "raw fruit" who tf cook fruit?
i HATE this
my hunch is actual politics and thinking, which is crossing the barrier to totally socially unacceptable are being replaced by this because it's still acceptable. average low status normie contrarian can no longer say FUCK NIGGERS or I LOVE SATAN, but says it instead with "carnivore, evolutionary psychology principles of living"
To reiterate (cuz my parentheses thing made it too convoluted), being able to consume something =/= necessary or optimized.
Btw can you aware me on the paleo men not existing thing? is it what i think it is (alien intervention in human evolution)
i see the idea of paleo diet and evolution as a contradiction with basic logic.
science and the scientific method is legit bc it's just working on inductive/deductive reasoning
when they look at the distant past there are assumptions behind it that are totally arbitrary (immutability, no aliens ect)
and throw out anything that might be a direct source from that time as something with 0 value while obsessing on the
you can say it's probably true but have to knowledge it's complex speculation based on 12 half proven pieces that is trumped by any direct evidence (it taste good vs paleo man ate it)
what is the paleo diet?
gee i dunno, how many angels can sit on the head of a pin?
most ppl can see the youtube podcasters are call centre tier scammers who accumulated enough karma to receive an anglo-saxon body
universities are largely the same but get around this thru status halo
i genuinely believe the reason scientists believe in evolution is not because of the normie arguments but because it creates an intricate, machevillian web of work that self-justifies itself.
if you drill down on one of these evolutionary scientists, sometimes they admit, yes, this is not a fact but a web of orthodox assumptions made only because it's useful in context
if you ask one of these guys how exactly it is useful (it isn't)
their justification is the categories they use are useful to others in the field who change their decisions based on these.
thing is, it's still totally arbitrary what changes actually happen because it's just shifting imaginary definitions lawyer style.
every 20 years or so new tech comes around that lets them re-examine everything
"i wonder how x technologies impacted our understanding of how closely related pond scum and rotten cheese are"
