22-02-2023, 03:31 PM
(22-02-2023, 03:07 PM)brocode Wrote:(22-02-2023, 03:02 PM)lonelyjak Wrote:(22-02-2023, 02:47 PM)brocode Wrote:(22-02-2023, 02:30 PM)lonelyjak Wrote: this makes no sense. a 5/10 should be 50th percentile. I have no idea where youre getting the logic for your looks weighting from
the average person would use a looks scale that is something like what im envisioning; they wouldnt be using this "4/10 is 75th percentile" type stuff. that makes no sense at all
No it does make sense, percentile is different from raw score.
The distribution of Lookz is normal (bell curve) and not equal.
What you say would you be correct if 10% of the population was 1/10, 10% of the population was 2/10, 10% of the population was 3/10.. and so on.
But it’s not that way.
Barely 2% of the population is 1/10, but there are more 3/10 girls, more than 10%.
It’s a graph like this
read what I wrote again. I said that the average person wouldnt understand it in this way. yeah your rubric might be "technically" correct, but it doesnt make sense to your average person
So? Just because the average person lacks the comprehension skills, doesn’t mean I’m gonna change it and make it less accurate
that doesnt change the fact that you misunderstand what I originally wrote. youre just sidestepping now
secondly, youre entitled to use whatever rubric you want, but dont expect people to be able to understand it
I relentlessly bully shitposters, /pol/faggots and admin. NO EXCEPTIONS!
