06-02-2023, 07:43 PM
(06-02-2023, 03:34 PM)Steppenwolf Wrote:(06-02-2023, 03:28 PM)lonelyjak Wrote:(06-02-2023, 10:57 AM)Steppenwolf Wrote:(06-02-2023, 10:53 AM)lonelyjak Wrote: >the white elite are still in control!
>heh this means that the west isnt actually getting colonized
>white genes are just gonna get more valuable as the white population decreases :)
>more unintelligible /pol/ cope and non-sensical arguments
nothing about what you posted disproves the fact that the west is getting colonized. im puzzled that you even think this is an argument
if you still did not get it then i'm afraid you are mentally handicapped
(06-02-2023, 10:53 AM)lonelyjak Wrote: btw the reason I fixate on your (likely) /pol/ habit is because of the poor quality of your argumentation. this isnt the first time i've debated with you:
https://bookism.net/showthread.php?tid=12673
you have a history of making broad, indefensible and/or uninformed arguments. I don't glow, I just have experience debating with you
you agreed America is anticulture you drooling retard (e.g, the conversation ended there)
there was no point to get, you were just evading a simple point and denying that the west was being colonized itself by trying to obfuscate and make some tangential argument
no...the argument actually ended when I pointed out that europeans are not one monolithic genotype and actually differ genetically from one ethnicity to the other, something which you apparently didnt know seeing as you never replied back. you literally thought that all whites were the same lol. this was really easy to check btw, all you had to do was visit the link I conveniently provided, but you couldnt even do that. /pol/chuds are always lazy with the details and just fling shit
weak bait
(06-02-2023, 03:37 PM)Steppenwolf Wrote: you interprated it that way. my point was that culture isn't totally or necessarily expressed by genotype, which means it can be lost over time if not maintained throughout tradition
no, you were actually just wrong in this thread:
https://bookism.net/showthread.php?tid=12673
and its really easy for anyone to see that if they care enough to read each of our arguments (but nobody cares that much besides us). thats why you never responded to my last response, you had nothing to say. youre now trying to retroactively patch up your argument
as for the colonization thing, just stop dude. youre trying to obfuscate the central argument and add arbitrary qualifiers and stuff so that the current colonization of the west somehow doesnt count. its obvious what youre doing
the west is currently getting colonized in a dozen different ways, its basically getting its ass kicked and asking for more. theres no other way to reframe this. by the logic of your OP, this makes the west ultra-feminine too (which was always a pointless, meaningless argument to begin with). the entire point of me responding isnt to argue about what qualifies as colonialism, rather its to call you out for making poor arguments.
listen bud, if you gotta punch down to make you feel better about yourself or the race you belong to then that just reflects your own insecurity. if you wanna trash talk ethnics thats fine, theres a lot of funny and true things you can say about them, but you just make yourself look bad when you do the whole: "ETHNICS BAD, WHITES GOOD". that's such /pol/ tier bs and it's so chuddy
I relentlessly bully shitposters, /pol/faggots and admin. NO EXCEPTIONS!
