do people realize ethnics are ultra-feminine?

[lonelyjak]

see Indians, Arabs, Latin Americans and Africans. what they share in common is thinner necks, softer skin in a youthful way, shorter stature (Africans are except to this) propensity to accumulate body/face-fat, and mentally they are so estrogenic that there's nowhere to be found mathematical or raw artistic talent (ex, for masc exp. architecture)

it's too obvious. there's a reason they got colonized, lmao. also, 'IQ' is simply an expression of masc/fem duality (analytical/systematical thinking v. stupidity/blank-mindedness?)

one of those continents share one of the highest tranny rates in the World (SAmerica) and i would not be surprised if the only reason Arabs are not there too is because they suicide/kill each other before they can tranny out

/pol/posting is the worst posting. if ethnics got colonized because theyre ultra-feminine then what does this imply about the west which is currently getting (((colonized)))?

to make a blanket statement like ethnics are ultra-feminine just sounds like stormfrontcel cope. if youre gonna criticize ethnics then at least make accurate criticisms and not sloppy /pol/tier cope

since? you realize what's currently happening is a redistribution of wealth, and creation of a bigger inequality?

rearranging what im saying doesnt change the reality of the matter. the west is getting (((colonized))), why deny this? and if the west is getting colonized then this would imply that the west must be ultra-feminine too

keep in mind that I dont even believe the above argument, Im just using the juxtaposition to demonstrate how weak your argument is. /pol/ posters always paint in overly broad strokes, but reality is never as black and white as they like to act like it is. /pol/ glows so fucking hard these days, I wouldnt spend too much time there because youre probably talking to IDF most of the time