14-01-2023, 04:38 AM
(14-01-2023, 04:36 AM)lonelyjak Wrote:(14-01-2023, 04:32 AM)Steppenwolf Wrote:its funny how bad your reading is, you always miss important points that I make. nothing you said is mutually exclusive with what I just said(14-01-2023, 03:52 AM)lonelyjak Wrote: yeah and the OP is explaining why theyre not supposed to lead. there are other biological/psychological reasons as well, and im not excluding them, but the OP is one of the major components of it though
no, it isn't an explanation for it. the explanation for it is determined by their gender role itself, and this isn't confined to biological reasons either. they simply aren't supposed to be leaders starting by the reason that Women are too much of herd and social creatures, and a leader is never that. they may be charismatic, but there's always something much obscure going on behind the scenes. leaders have divergence, and women are more of a single entity with many faces
youre the definition of a redpilled midwit
no, you are just wrong
nothing "redpilled" about what i said either, gender is LAW, and the hint to your thread is in femininity itself. not that "muh pooor wymynn weren't pressured enough" you nerd
maybe they are never pressured enough because we know they are fycking retarded?
![[Image: saturn.jpg]](https://i.ibb.co/tPHJf0T/saturn.jpg)
