[LOL] cannot be stressed enough how cringe it is that autismo PSLers

[Steppenwolf]

you are acting no differento to what OP describe. some people look decent with a 'relatively' large philtrum maybe because their entire face isn't utterly horrendous

no...some people have stretched out facial features overall and the large philtrum fits in with that; other people have more compact facial features and the large philtrum contrasts badly with it

OP is saying that many autistic PSLers think that a slayer MUST have a single, particular good feature. im saying that good looks originate in overall facial harmony. so im not even advocating that every good looking person must have a particular type of ramus or whatever, im literally saying that in every situation its different and that a persons features should harmonize well with their other features in order to look good

yet, its on the nose stupid, the reason why both is wrong is the same reason we think of 95% of surgeries as uncanny. both ways of thinking is addressing aesthetics as if humans were Frankenstein

its amazing how what you think im saying is 100% the opposite of what im actually saying. 

im proposing a completely holistic and organic way of assessing aesthetics; this is completely opposite to acting as if humans were frankenstein. good looking people have balanced features that are harmonious with their other features.

you are not thinking about what you are saying. such thing doesn't exist. it's easy to look at someone like Lachowski and instinctively see it as "harmonious" or it "just works." but it's something you can't even reverse, you can't think what it could be otherwise, because you're forgetting it's not a Frankenstein with individual features set together, whch is why you constantly push the "works together" nonsense. you are not seeing the pattern that many pure (in the sense of European) caucasians present that is the "fine" traits, in width, and angularity of whole skull. which on Lachowski in specific with his soft features being top-tier and so his low-asymmetry makes him what he is

theres no one single trait that makes someone good looking, rather its the sum of the parts that makes a person good looking (or not) and this particular "sum of the parts" differs from individual to individual. theres no specific formula for this. theres absolutely nothing controversial about what im saying

youre trolling me and just being deliberately stubborn

ok, but it seems you did not understand yet why i said we can so easily detect uncanny valley in 95% of surgeries (there's no actual "parts" and only wholes. which is why you should consider an actual holistic approach and try tackle and understand why people look the way they do, why features when isolated are the way they are, which often involves the whole skull, tendons, skin et cetera)