13-01-2023, 06:38 PM
(13-01-2023, 06:18 PM)Steppenwolf Wrote:its amazing how what you think im saying is 100% the opposite of what im actually saying.(13-01-2023, 02:52 PM)lonelyjak Wrote:(13-01-2023, 12:55 PM)Steppenwolf Wrote:(12-01-2023, 11:15 PM)lonelyjak Wrote: yeah it does. some people look decent with a relatively large philtrum and others do not; proportions of overall facial features relative to each other matter. likewise when it comes to coloring some people have desirable hair + eye color combos and others do not; this can even include the color of the eyebrows as well
the reason bad features look bad is because they're extreme which implies disproportionality. harmony implies good proportions. I dont know whats so hard to understand about that
you are acting no differento to what OP describe. some people look decent with a 'relatively' large philtrum maybe because their entire face isn't utterly horrendous
no...some people have stretched out facial features overall and the large philtrum fits in with that; other people have more compact facial features and the large philtrum contrasts badly with it
OP is saying that many autistic PSLers think that a slayer MUST have a single, particular good feature. im saying that good looks originate in overall facial harmony. so im not even advocating that every good looking person must have a particular type of ramus or whatever, im literally saying that in every situation its different and that a persons features should harmonize well with their other features in order to look good
yet, its on the nose stupid, the reason why both is wrong is the same reason we think of 95% of surgeries as uncanny. both ways of thinking is addressing aesthetics as if humans were Frankenstein
im proposing a completely holistic and organic way of assessing aesthetics; this is completely opposite to acting as if humans were frankenstein. good looking people have balanced features that are harmonious with their other features. theres no one single trait that makes someone good looking, rather its the sum of the parts that makes a person good looking (or not) and this particular "sum of the parts" differs from individual to individual. theres no specific formula for this. theres absolutely nothing controversial about what im saying
youre trolling me and just being deliberately stubborn
I relentlessly bully shitposters, /pol/faggots and admin. NO EXCEPTIONS!
