13-01-2023, 04:24 PM
(13-01-2023, 04:14 PM)eldajaal1488 Wrote:yeah I get what youre saying(13-01-2023, 03:08 PM)lonelyjak Wrote:i mean if u put overly angular eyes on face with low overall masculinity yeah, mass in cheekbones should be universal, like eyebrows, good contrast etc.(13-01-2023, 03:04 PM)eldajaal1488 Wrote:(13-01-2023, 12:46 PM)Steppenwolf Wrote: it does not and you would only think that because of specific nordic countriesdude why would u think specific nerdic country? like think about it, someone else whos flawless is already gl. doesnt need insane cheekbones or very angular ,,hunter'' eyes, which obviously would make 1 from gl to insanely gl. facial averageness is basically meme term for no flaws
I would even argue that some people would look worse if they had insane cheekbones or very angular hunter eyes (assuming that these features didnt properly harmonize with the rest of their face)
like think of that standup comedian guy who banged kim kardashian, masculine face with bulging eyes. looks weird af but still good. would be like that but reversed. if u put ,,hunter'' eyes on him he would be straight up brad pitt tho
I relentlessly bully shitposters, /pol/faggots and admin. NO EXCEPTIONS!
