17-10-2022, 11:38 PM
(17-10-2022, 11:34 PM)AntonioJuraz Wrote:(17-10-2022, 11:33 PM)artisanalshitposter Wrote:(17-10-2022, 11:29 PM)AntonioJuraz Wrote:(17-10-2022, 11:17 PM)artisanalshitposter Wrote: cope, its really not that simple. take for instance if some guy is extremely autistic about classical music; if this guy is wealthy then all the sudden his autism about classical music looks extremely sophisticated and elegant whereas if the guy was middle class then he would just appear to be an over-obsessed weirdo
I can personally recall times where I thought something was lame (like rap music) but then some rich person I would be hanging out with would be listening to rap music and suddenly I would think rap music was much cooler than I previously thought it was, simply because it got haloed by being associated with a rich person
lmao you are the one coping here. you are also very impressionable like a woman or a child, do you fall under one of these categories?
my previous point was legit, thats why you cant disprove it. thats why the original theory was LMS (Looks Money Status). to a degree, money and status can halo things; this is how mass media works to manipulate the masses, by getting celebrities and pop-culture to endorse various things. are you saying that the mass media and the original LMS theory are wrong too?
if the rich guy lost all their money and became homeless but kept listening to rap music, do you still think rap is cool?
youre dodging my point incel. this is why you have to keep deflecting instead of just addressing my original points
