18-06-2026, 11:39 PM
It depends on gender.
For men: linguistic and interpersonal
For women: logical-mathematical, visual-spatial, and intrapersonal
The reason is because men are ontologically logical-mathematical, visual-spatial, and intrapersonal, and women are ontologically linguistic and interpersonal.
Intelligence is best defined as the ability to successfully navigate the unknown. For men, the linguistic and interpersonal is by nature unknown. For women, the logical-mathematical, visual-spatial, and intrapersonal is by nature unknown. Hence, the ability of each gender to navigate the forms of intelligence unknown to them is the highest marker of overall intelligence. A woman who can only master the linguistic-verbal and/or interpersonal is stupid. So is the man who can only master the logical-mathematic, the visual-spatial, and the intrapersonal.
For men: linguistic and interpersonal
For women: logical-mathematical, visual-spatial, and intrapersonal
The reason is because men are ontologically logical-mathematical, visual-spatial, and intrapersonal, and women are ontologically linguistic and interpersonal.
Intelligence is best defined as the ability to successfully navigate the unknown. For men, the linguistic and interpersonal is by nature unknown. For women, the logical-mathematical, visual-spatial, and intrapersonal is by nature unknown. Hence, the ability of each gender to navigate the forms of intelligence unknown to them is the highest marker of overall intelligence. A woman who can only master the linguistic-verbal and/or interpersonal is stupid. So is the man who can only master the logical-mathematic, the visual-spatial, and the intrapersonal.
