24-01-2026, 10:32 AM
(24-01-2026, 08:09 AM)Austrian Painter Wrote: you made this argument up
the providence of Christs laws is not between natural and unnatural
but between being and anti-being or, morally, good and evil. here you are implying that there was any statement from him pointing to or that what he said is and should be natural or that it is in alignment with that that is 'natural'
There was no perception of things as natural or unnatural back then, you fucking retard. That distinction and consequent, typical for christards, fallacious 50 iq adoption of that dichotomy arose from natural philosophy aka protoscience centuries later. Why? Because religious concepts are literal ontological definition of basic (hence idiotic and extremely infantile from the perspective of everyone with half a brain living today)
Contextually speaking, good vs evil in 133 BC = natural vs unnatural from the middle ages (earlier too, but it was fringe and isolated on the west) and onwards
Stick with posting moronic pics that are supposed to feed schizo retards the delusion that they possess anything resembling the ability to comprehend

![[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]](https://i.ibb.co/8nqCLH50/Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookism-Edit-Buddy-and-Ignore-Lists.png)