14-01-2026, 04:16 AM
I have a new Comparison on why "emotions" are an idiotic point in dating.
The fact is, men are looking for physical, visual, carnal things from women.
So for them to then cite "emotions" (something non-physical) as relevant, is comparable to the following tale.
A woman needed $30 to survive so she asked a rich man for it. She was rejected but later advised:
"You have to talk to him about dreams."
It's like, what the hell? Dreams? That is non-physical, and I want the material.
The fact is, men are looking for physical, visual, carnal things from women.
So for them to then cite "emotions" (something non-physical) as relevant, is comparable to the following tale.
A woman needed $30 to survive so she asked a rich man for it. She was rejected but later advised:
"You have to talk to him about dreams."
It's like, what the hell? Dreams? That is non-physical, and I want the material.
