26-10-2025, 08:00 PM
to explain what i meant by 'natsoc germany was a pawn'
lets say thats not a negative, but the reasons being materialistic and fabian were (eugenics, state worship)
now, the holy see saw in germany and the axis a possibility of hope against the bigger evil of a hegelian antichrist-ian state (that was, ussr, marxism.) - the anglos, or particularly the british, saw germany specifically as a buffer between them and the east, the americans similarly, albeit much more isolationist, so indifferent in a sense
it became a huge problem for the holy see when natsoc germany invaded poland, because the very leader of the military order, or the black pope, as a polish himself started to have a strong dislike for hitler, and it was a huge problem for the anglos when hitler made a pact with the ussr, which was also seen as a betrayal by the pope
lets say thats not a negative, but the reasons being materialistic and fabian were (eugenics, state worship)
now, the holy see saw in germany and the axis a possibility of hope against the bigger evil of a hegelian antichrist-ian state (that was, ussr, marxism.) - the anglos, or particularly the british, saw germany specifically as a buffer between them and the east, the americans similarly, albeit much more isolationist, so indifferent in a sense
it became a huge problem for the holy see when natsoc germany invaded poland, because the very leader of the military order, or the black pope, as a polish himself started to have a strong dislike for hitler, and it was a huge problem for the anglos when hitler made a pact with the ussr, which was also seen as a betrayal by the pope
