10-06-2022, 02:35 AM
(10-06-2022, 02:21 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: mirin
philosophy of law is interesting but I don't think I could ever study law because it seems so dry
it's not as philosophical, there's just an epistemological source in every claim
the dryness of it makes it appealing to me, i see it like math/physics, with the difference that it's intellectually accessible to me
- what's the source of legitimacy of legal norms
- nomotechnique + linguistics
- ranking of norms by power
- solving antinomies, voids and badly/ambiguously written rules
- lartpourlartesque standards for law-writing to make the process more uniform and interpretable (and even including computer programming/ai in the process of legislation updating)
- meticulously defining the roles of judges-district attorneys/private attorneys-the police-the parties-the public etc
- providing conceptual solutions for a million problems specialis arising in each of the 10-12 officially recognized branches of law (example: legal personality of a company)
- related issues with ethics and morality/economics/philosophy
+ much more
i'm filling like half a notebook per afternoon when working with my electronic devices off, just by deriving thoughts from my brain
dont really experience the same pleasure from any other activity

![[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]](https://i.ibb.co/8nqCLH50/Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookism-Edit-Buddy-and-Ignore-Lists.png)