31-08-2025, 02:02 AM
Looks theory is in general something I have no time for. It's fun to discuss looks, like it is fun for some people to discuss sports or what seperates specific cars.
But being obsessed with apperance is the most gay and neurotic thing. I regret ever having developed BDD. It is simply true that the "bluepill" view of normies is the correct one.
And you'll never encounter a person obsessed with looks, who is "deeply in touch with reality". Looks theory obsessed freaks are always the most escapist people. No one is more in denial than them.
It's funny cause the moment one acknowledges any minor aspect of "looks theory", these people will call you a hypocrite. See kath in my post about the chad priest.
It's like an obese person calling you a hypocrite for eating. You took a fundamental truth ("Looks are an important factor") and distort it to a ridiculous hyper-autistic claim ("Looks are the only thing that matters and people are defined by looks alone.")
But being obsessed with apperance is the most gay and neurotic thing. I regret ever having developed BDD. It is simply true that the "bluepill" view of normies is the correct one.
And you'll never encounter a person obsessed with looks, who is "deeply in touch with reality". Looks theory obsessed freaks are always the most escapist people. No one is more in denial than them.
It's funny cause the moment one acknowledges any minor aspect of "looks theory", these people will call you a hypocrite. See kath in my post about the chad priest.
It's like an obese person calling you a hypocrite for eating. You took a fundamental truth ("Looks are an important factor") and distort it to a ridiculous hyper-autistic claim ("Looks are the only thing that matters and people are defined by looks alone.")
