@slop slinger i have a philosophy question for you

[Altruist]

never really found this to be an interesting observation seems like you could extend that to our ability to conceptualize anything

no idea what you just said. there's clearly some overlap between the concepts as we make them and constituents of reality (at least as we perceive it, because the opposite would be paradoxical), the mistake lies in reversing that process and assuming something exists in nature in a certain way because it would fit our conceptualization

the relation between our current perception of "rationalist" axioms and earlier people's perception of religious dogmas is the fucking same. how is this not water and how do people still make the same mistake despite having a larger sample size than abrahamic religions' apologists beats me (speaking in general, not attacking you)