the bayesian interpretation of probability is so based

[Munificent]

you are being dogmatic. the true nature of randomness in the universe is not understood

yeah, classical, frequentist, propensity

yeah, i considered that. 

arent classical, frequentist etc just different ways to define probability, not what probability actually measures?

they are interpretations. ie wtf does a 50% chance mean

so bayesian interpretation is this: essentially probabilities aren't real, they are just subjective interpretations of how likely an event is

and somehow the other interpretations disagree with this?

yeah

dont believe you