09-05-2022, 02:51 AM
(09-05-2022, 02:49 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:(09-05-2022, 02:34 AM)Munificent Wrote:(09-05-2022, 02:31 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:(09-05-2022, 02:28 AM)Munificent Wrote:it evidently was.(09-05-2022, 02:26 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: this is a very emotion fuelled response btw, lmfao at this hypocrisy
did i claim that my statement was an argument?
you were attempting to discredit my point
nope, i was showing that you constantly make statements that apply to yourself and try to apply it universally
then i responded to your post saying that by showing this, i now understand how you communicate and can understand past interactions through this new lens
well if something applies to most people then the chances are it also applies to me - I am self-aware enough to understand this
no, it was clearly a dig at me for some dopamine. lmao at this pathetic ad hoc attempt at logical justification
it was obviously a 'dig at you'. that should be blatantly obvious and not even necessary to be said. i was explaining the dig, not trying to justify anything.
and the problem is that you take something that applies to you and then apply it to everyone else, not the other way around. at least thats what appears to happen
